纺织学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (11): 53-58.doi: 10.13475/j.fzxb.20191200606

• 纺织工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

针织西服面料的挺括风格研究

李新彤, 高哲, 顾洪阳, 丛洪莲()   

  1. 江南大学 教育部针织技术工程研究中心, 江苏 无锡 214122
  • 收稿日期:2019-12-02 修回日期:2020-08-07 出版日期:2020-11-15 发布日期:2020-11-26
  • 通讯作者: 丛洪莲
  • 作者简介:李新彤(1994—),女,硕士。主要研究方向为针织结构的创新设计及性能研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(61602212);国家自然科学基金项目(61902150);无锡市针织科技服务平台项目(WX03-07D0304-021700-06)

Study on stiffness style of knitted suit fabrics

LI Xintong, GAO Zhe, GU Hongyang, CONG Honglian()   

  1. Engineering Research Center for Knitting Technology, Ministry of Education, Jiangnan University,Wuxi, Jiangsu 214122, China
  • Received:2019-12-02 Revised:2020-08-07 Online:2020-11-15 Published:2020-11-26
  • Contact: CONG Honglian

摘要:

为探讨针织面料在西服开发应用的要求与标准,寻找能够用于西服开发的针织面料,分别从弯曲长度、折皱回复性、悬垂性3个方面对针织面料的挺括风格进行量化分析。借助实验仪器以及数据处理得到弯曲刚度、折皱回复角、静态悬垂系数3项性能指标,以机织西服面料为参考标准,对针织面料的挺括风格进行研究分析。结果表明:6路变化罗马组织是较为适合针织面料开发西服的组织结构,其结构稳定性优于12路小提花组织以及变化间隔组织,降低纵向弯曲刚度与横向弯曲刚度的差异;织物厚度增加0.1 mm,折皱回复程度提高10%;织物密度控制在110~130线圈/(5 cm)时,悬垂程度达到机织西服面料的60%以上;6路变化罗马组织配合高织物密度能够使针织面料的挺括风格达到机织西服面料的80%。

关键词: 针织面料, 弯曲刚度, 折皱回复角, 悬垂系数, 挺括风格

Abstract:

In order to discuss the requirements and standards for the development and application of knitted fabrics for suits, this study quantified the stiffness style of knitted fabrics in three aspects, i.e. bending length, wrinkle recovery and drape. With the help of experimental instruments and data processing, three performance indicators, bending stiffness, wrinkle recovery angle and static drape coefficient, were obtained. The woven suit fabric was used as a benchmark to study and analyze the stiffness style of knitted fabrics. The results show that knitted fabrics using the six-way-change Roman knit structure is more suitable for suits, and the structural stability of the six-way-change Roman knit structure is better than that of the twelve-way small jacquard structure and the variable interval structure, which reduces the difference between the course and wale flexural stiffness. The fabric thickness of the six-way-change Roman knit structure is 0.1 mm thicker, and the degree of crease recovery is 10% higher. When the fabric density is set to 110-130 loops/(5 cm), the degree of drape reaches more than 60% of that for the woven suit fabric. It is shown that the six-way-change Roman structure combined with high fabric density makes the stiffness style of knitted fabric reach 80% of that of the woven suit fabric.

Key words: knitted fabric, bending stiffness, wrinkle recovery angle, drape coefficient, stiffness style

中图分类号: 

  • TS186.2

表1

织物试样参数"

分类 含量/% 织物
编号
经纬密/
(根·(5 cm)-1)
横纵密/
(线圈·(5 cm) -1)
面密度/
(g·m-2)
厚度/
mm
类别
经向 纬向 横密 纵密
毛型
面料
20(羊毛) 1 200 190 198 0.39 机织
2 130 130 209 0.63 针织6路变化罗马组织
3 125 130 199 0.52 针织6路变化罗马组织
4 105 100 200 0.53 针织12路小提花组织
20~40(羊毛) 5 210 175 180 0.41 机织
6 80 40 180 0.69 针织12路小提花组织
7 120 80 195 0.92 针织6路变化间隔组织
40~60(羊毛) 8 240 165 198 0.40 机织
9 120 80 182 0.65 针织6路变化间隔组织
10 115 75 177 0.65 针织8路变化间隔组织
棉型
面料
60(棉) 11 250 245 199 0.34 机织
12 120 150 195 0.72 针织6路变化罗马组织
13 115 160 185 0.63 针织2路棉毛组织
14 80 100 175 0.62 针织6路双面珠地
15 75 80 210 0.64 针织8路蜂巢组织

图1

织物弯曲长度测试原理"

图2

织物弯曲刚度柱状图"

图3

织物悬垂程度比例图"

图4

针织面料综合评价"

[1] 顾莹莹. 有/无粘合覆衬西服面料的风格与性能[D]. 苏州:苏州大学, 2012: 1-4.
GU Yingying. The style and properties of the laminating/non-laminating covering suits' fabric[D]. Suzhou: Soochow University, 2012: 1-4.
[2] 肖学霞. 基于FAST仪力学性能测试的织物手感客观评价研究[D]. 苏州:苏州大学, 2005: 1-66.
XIAO Xuexia. Research of fabric handle objective evaluation based on the FAST mechanical performance testing[D]. Suzhou: Soochow University, 2005: 1-66.
[3] 吴坚, 赵玉萍, 周新刚. 亚麻/涤纶交织物的抗皱性能[J]. 纺织学报, 2006,27(10):89-91.
WU Jian, ZHAO Yuping, ZHOU Xingang. Wrinkle resistance of linen and polyester mixture[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2006,27(10):89-91.
[4] 吕丽华, 吴坚, 叶方. 织物结构对折皱弹性和硬挺度的影响[J]. 纺织学报, 2004,25(5):99-101,153.
LÜ Lihua, WU Jian, YE Fang. Effect of fabric structure on crease elasticity and stiffness[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2004,25(5):99-101, 153.
[5] 石风俊, 胡金莲. 织物的弯曲性能[J]. 纺织学报, 2005,26(3):15-18.
SHI Fengjun, HU Jinlian. The bending properties of fabrics[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2005,26(3):15-18.
[6] 韩蓉, 胡堃, 吴戈, 等. 应用图像法的织物弯曲刚度计算[J]. 纺织学报, 2016,37(3):41-46.
HAN Rong, HU Yan, WU Ge, et al. Calculation on bending stiffness of woven fabrics by image processing method[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2016,37(3):41-46.
[7] 何琦辉. 利用织物实际弯曲形态测试织物弯曲性能的方法研究[D]. 上海:东华大学, 2005: 9-12
HE Qihui. Research on testing method for bending property of textile using actual bending shape of fabric[D]. Shanghai: Donghua University, 2005: 9-12.
[8] 杜赵群, 于伟东. 纱线与织物风格的综合评价系统与表征方法研究:系统特征比较与基本参数确定[J]. 东华大学学报(自然科学版), 2006,32(3):115-119.
DU Zhaoqun, YU Weidong. Comprehensive evaluation system and characterization for the handle of fabric and yarn: the comparisons of systematic characteristics and the definition of basic parameters[J]. Journal of Donghua University (Natural Science), 2006,32(3):115-119.
[9] 倪红, 潘永惠. 基于BP神经网络的织物斜向弯曲性能的预测[J]. 纺织学报, 2009,30(2):48-51.
NI Hong, PAN Yonghui. Prediction of fabric diagonal bending rigidity by BP neural network[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2009,30(2):48-51.
[10] 王革辉. KES与FAST系统测织物低应力力学性能的比较[J]. 纺织学报, 2002,23(6):30-31.
WANG Gehui. Comparison of low stress mechanical properties of fabrics measured by KES and FAST systems[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2002,23(6):30-31.
[11] 吴巧英, 胡滢, 吴春胜, 等. 不同织物弯曲性能测试仪测试结果的比较[J]. 纺织学报, 2015,36(7):126-130.
WU Qiaoying, HU Ying, WU Chunsheng, et al. Comparative analysis on test results of different fabric bending behavior test[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2015,36(7):126-130.
[12] 季慧, 蒋耀兴, 张长胜. 织物弯曲性能测试新方法[J]. 丝绸, 2017,54(3):33-37.
JI Hui, JIANG Yaoxing, ZHANG Changsheng. A new test method for fabric bending behavior[J]. Journal of Silk, 2017,54(3):33-37.
[13] 韩燕娜. 织物弯曲性与悬垂性测试新方法[J]. 丝绸, 2019,56(4):30-34.
HAN Yanna. A new testing method for fabric bending & draping behavior[J]. Journal of Silk, 2019,56(4):30-34.
[14] 黄三娇, 高卫东, 王鸿博. 精纺毛织物结构参数与折皱回复性的关系[J]. 纺织学报, 2016,37(11):37-41.
HUANG Sanjiao, GAO Weidong, WANG Hongbo. Relationship between structure parameters and wrinkle resistance of worsted fabric[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2016,37(11):37-41.
[15] 张月, 王蕾, 刘建立, 等. 织物折皱回复角测试方法比较[J]. 纺织学报, 2015,36(1):60-63,71.
ZHANG Yue, WANG Lei, LIU Jianli, et al. Comparison of test methods for fabric wrinkle recovery angle[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2015,36(1):60-63,71.
[16] 杨萍. 织物与纱线弯曲刚度的评价与研究[D]. 上海:东华大学, 2002: 23-29.
YANG Ping. Study on bending stiffness of yarns and fabrics[D]. Shanghai: Donghua University, 2002: 23-29.
[17] LIN H, STYLIOS G K. Prediction of post-buckling deformation in fabric drape[J]. Journal of The Textile Institute, 2009,100(1):35-43.
[18] 王春燕. 精纺毛织物悬垂性研究[J]. 毛纺科技, 2012,40(3):58-61.
WANG Chunyan. Research on the drapeability of worsted wool fabric[J]. Wool Textile Journal, 2012,40(3):58-61.
[19] 陈志蕾, 吴鲜鲜, 张红霞, 等. 基于系统聚类法的多组分混纺织物风格分析[J]. 纺织学报, 2012,33(9):50-54,60.
CHEN Zhilei, WU Xianxian, ZHANG Hongxia, et al. Analysis on style of multi-component blended fabrics based on clustering method[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2012,33(9):50-54,60.
[20] 李虹, 史祥斌, 杨艳菲. 染整加工中织物结构变化对其弯曲性能的影响[J]. 纺织学报, 2010,31(10):92-97.
LI Hong, SHI Xiangbin, YANG Yanfei. Influences of fabric structure change on bending rigidity during dyeing and finishing[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2010,31(10):92-97.
[21] 张晓婷. 织物折皱回复性能的研究[D]. 无锡:江南大学, 2008: 28-32.
ZHANG Xiaoting. Study on crease recovery of fabric[D]. Wuxi: Jiangnan University, 2008: 28-32.
[1] 胡霄睿, 孙丰鑫, 肖彩勤, 高卫东. 基于原位力学测试的织物折皱回复性表征[J]. 纺织学报, 2020, 41(10): 41-45.
[2] 苏旭中, 魏艳红, 刘新金, 谢春萍. 纺纱方式对织物抗皱性能及拉伸弹性的影响[J]. 纺织学报, 2020, 41(04): 33-38.
[3] 魏艳红, 刘新金, 谢春萍, 苏旭中, 张钟唏. 聚酯长丝/棉复合纱斜纹织物的保形性及服用性能[J]. 纺织学报, 2019, 40(12): 39-44.
[4] 徐海燕, 陈南梁, 蒋金华, 邵光伟. 加捻金属丝纱线的制备及其弯曲刚度[J]. 纺织学报, 2019, 40(01): 57-61.
[5] 刘成霞 周澳. 利用十字交叉法测试织物弯曲悬垂性[J]. 纺织学报, 2018, 39(06): 42-46.
[6] 杨书会 王瑞. 纯棉织物折皱回复角与其组织结构参数的关系[J]. 纺织学报, 2017, 38(04): 46-49.
[7] 刘成霞 韩永华. 模拟实际着装的织物抗皱性测试方法[J]. 纺织学报, 2017, 38(03): 56-60.
[8] 黄张秘 周翔 邢志奇 张文龙. 棉织物的聚羧酸无甲醛免烫整理[J]. 纺织学报, 2017, 38(01): 94-99.
[9] 韩蓉 胡堃 毋戈 钟跃崎. 应用图像法的织物弯曲刚度计算[J]. 纺织学报, 2016, 37(3): 41-46.
[10] 刘成霞 刘婷. 应用小波分析的服装关节部位抗皱性评价[J]. 纺织学报, 2016, 37(12): 87-91.
[11] 黄三娇 高卫东 王鸿博. 精纺毛织物结构参数与折皱回复性的关系[J]. 纺织学报, 2016, 37(11): 37-41.
[12] 刘宇 沈一峰 杨雷. 新型无甲醛防皱整理剂BTP400在棉织物上的应用[J]. 纺织学报, 2016, 37(08): 77-82.
[13] 张月 王蕾 刘建立 高卫东. 试验参数对棉织物回复角测试结果的影响[J]. 纺织学报, 2015, 36(08): 33-37.
[14] 丛洪莲 张永超. 生物基锦纶的性能及其在针织面料中的应用[J]. 纺织学报, 2015, 36(07): 22-27.
[15] 吴巧英 胡滢 吴春胜 劳世慧. 不同织物弯曲性能测试仪测试结果的比较[J]. 纺织学报, 2015, 36(07): 126-130.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!