基于心理物理学实验的非荧光织物白度公式评价

doi:10.13475/j.fzxb.20210903408

纺织学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (11): 119-126.doi: 10.13475/j.fzxb.20210903408

基于心理物理学实验的非荧光织物白度公式评价

杨红英¹(), 齐梦园¹^,², 杨志晖¹, 杨艳丽¹, 张靖晶¹, 谢宛姿³

1.中原工学院纺织学院, 河南郑州 450007
2.青岛大学纺织服装学院, 山东青岛 266100
3.江南大学纺织科学与工程学院, 江苏无锡 214122

收稿日期:2021-09-10 修回日期:2022-08-26 出版日期:2022-11-15 发布日期:2022-12-26
作者简介:杨红英(1970—),女,教授,博士。主要研究方向为纺织色彩学、数字化与智能化纺织技术。E-mail:webyhy@163.com。
基金资助:
中原工学院交叉学科团队支持计划项目(中工研[2018]13号)

Whiteness formulae evaluation of non-fluorescent fabrics by psychophysical experiments

YANG Hongying¹(), QI Mengyuan¹^,², YANG Zhihui¹, YANG Yanli¹, ZHANG Jingjing¹, XIE Wanzi³

1. College of Textile, Zhongyuan University of Technology, Zhengzhou, Henan 450007, China
2. College of Textile & Clothing, Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong 266100, China
3. College of Textile Science and Engineering, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214122, China

Received:2021-09-10 Revised:2022-08-26 Published:2022-11-15 Online:2022-12-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为给非荧光纺织品白度评价优选出最接近人眼色觉的白度公式,采用白色辨识实验从自制非荧光织物中挑出白色样品,再分别挑选28个和85个样品开展成对比较法和类别判定法2种心理物理学实验,处理1万余个视觉评价数据,与9个白度公式的计算白度值作对比和统计分析,综合评价白度公式的预测性能。结果显示:以成对比较法评价白度公式时,亨特2(Hunter2)白度公式效果最好;以类别判定法评价白度公式时,Hunter2白度公式依然最好;2种评价方法结果一致,对于本文所用非荧光织物,原适用于评价荧光织物的Hunter2白度公式与人眼色觉的一致性最优。

关键词: 非荧光织物, 白度公式, 视觉评价, 成对比较法, 类别判定法

Abstract:

In order to choose the whiteness formula that is closest to human perception for non-fluorescent textile whiteness evaluation, 9 whiteness formulae were studied. White samples were selected from self-made non-fluorescent fabrics using white discrimination visual evaluation, and then 28 and 85 samples were selected to carry out 2 psychophysical experiments of pairwise comparison method and category determination method respectively. More than 10,000 visual evaluation data were processed for comparing and evaluating the predictive performance of the 9 whiteness formulae. Results show that when the whiteness formulae were evaluated by the pairwise comparison method and the category judgment method, Hunter2 formula performed the best for both cases. Therefore, for the non-fluorescent fabrics in this study, the Hunter2 whiteness formula originally designed for evaluating fluorescent fabrics is in the best agreement with the visual perception of human eyes.

Key words: non-fluorescent fabric, whiteness formula, visual evaluation, pairwise comparison method, category determination method

中图分类号:

TS197

杨红英, 齐梦园, 杨志晖, 杨艳丽, 张靖晶, 谢宛姿. 基于心理物理学实验的非荧光织物白度公式评价[J]. 纺织学报, 2022, 43(11): 119-126.

YANG Hongying, QI Mengyuan, YANG Zhihui, YANG Yanli, ZHANG Jingjing, XIE Wanzi. Whiteness formulae evaluation of non-fluorescent fabrics by psychophysical experiments[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2022, 43(11): 119-126.

图/表 14

图1

图2

表1

表2

表3

表4

表5

图3

表6

表7

表8

表9

图4

图5

参考文献 25

[1]	GANZ E. Whiteness formulas: a selection[J]. Applied Optics, 1979, 18(7): 1073-1078. doi: 10.1364/AO.18.001073 pmid: 20208877
[2]	GANZ E, GRIESSER R. Whiteness: assessment of tint[J]. Applied Optics, 1981, 20(8): 1395. doi: 10.1364/AO.20.001395 pmid: 20309319
[3]	GANZ E, PAULI HKA. Whiteness and tint formulas of the Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage: approximations in the L^a^b^* color space[J]. Applied Optics, 1995, 34(16): 2998-2999. doi: 10.1364/AO.34.002998
[4]	UCHIDAH. A new whiteness formula[J]. Color Research & Application, 1998, 23(4): 202-209.
[5]	孙雅清, 屠天民, 陈庆东. 荧光样品的白度测定[J]. 印染, 2000, 29(8): 38-41.
	SUN Yaqing, TU Tianmin, CHEN Qingdong. Testing the whiteness of fluorescent products[J]. China Dyeing & Finishing, 2000, 29(8): 38-41.
[6]	HE Guoxin, ZHOU Mingxun. Whiteness formula in CIELAB uniform color space[J]. Chinese Optics Letters, 2007(7): 432-434.
[7]	PÉREZ MDEL M, GHINEA R, RIVAS M J, et al. A method for evaluating Hunter whiteness of mixed powders[J] Advanced Powder Technology, 2009, 20(2): 123-126. doi: 10.1016/j.apt.2008.04.001
[8]	GUO Chunli, ZUO Xiaoyan, LIU Y, et al. The performance of different whiteness formulas for white papers[J]. Advances in Graphic Communication, Printing and Packaging, 2019, 543:102-107.
[9]	刘志红, 田慧敏, 石风俊, 等. 织物白度表征方法的研究[J]. 中原工学院学报, 2007, 18(3): 48-51.
	LIU Zhihong, TIAN Huimin, SHI Fengjun, et al. A study on characterization of whiteness of fabrics[J]. Journal of Zhongyuan University of Technology, 2007, 18(3): 48-51.
[10]	KATAYAMA I, FAIRCHILD M D. Quantitative evaluation of perceived whiteness based on a color vision mode[J]. Color Research & Application, 2010, 35(6): 410-418.
[11]	JAFARI R, AMIRSHAHI S H. Variation in the decisions of observers regarding the ordering of white samples[J]. Coloration Technology, 2008, 124(2): 127-131. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-4408.2008.00132.x
[12]	CHEN Y. Measurement of white colour containing fluorescent whitening agent[D]. UK: University of Leeds, 2013: 1-20.
[13]	杨红英, 杨艳丽, 杨志晖, 等. 基于荧光增白织物的白度公式评价[J]. 纺织高校基础科学学报. 2021, 34(2): 36-44.
	YANG Hongying, YANG Yanli, YANG Zhihui, et al. Evaluation of whiteness formulas for fluorescent fhitening abrics[J]. Basic Sciences Journal of Textile Universities, 2021, 34(2): 36-44.
[14]	GANZ E. Whiteness: photometric specification and colorimetric evaluation[J]. Applied optics, 1976, 15(9): 2039-2058. doi: 10.1364/AO.15.002039 pmid: 20165337
[15]	BARTLESON C J, GRUM F. Optical radiation measurements: visual measurements[M]. Orlando: Academic Press, 1984:441-489.
[16]	宫睿. 智能移动终端图像显示性能评价方法及应用研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2014:107.
	GONG Rui. Study of assessment method and application for image display performance of smart mobile devices[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2014:107.
[17]	LUO M R, MINCHEW C, KENYON P, et al. Verification of CIEDE 2000 using industrial data[C]// 2004 Color and Paints, Interim Meeting of the International Color Association, AIC 2004 Color and Paints Proceedings. Porto Alegre: AIC, 2004:97-102.
[18]	黄敏, 王丽丽, 刘浩学. 用比较法研究光泽度对印刷样品的中小色差影响[J]. 光学学报, 2010, 30(11): 3359-3366.
	HUANG Min, WANG Lili, LIU Haoxue. Study on the influence of gloss on printed samples medium-small color difference with the psychophysical method of compari-son[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2010, 30(11): 3359-3366. doi: 10.3788/AOS20103011.3359
[19]	THURSTONE L L. A law of comparative judgment[J]. Psychological Review, 1994, 101(2): 266-270. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.101.2.266
[20]	COATES E, WARBURTON F L. Colour-difference measurements in relation to visual assessments in the textile field[J]. Journal of the Society of Dyers and Colourists, 1968, 84(9): 467-474. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-4408.1968.tb02845.x
[21]	TORGERSON W S. A Law of categorical judge-ment[M]. New York: New York University Press, 1954: 92-93.
[22]	MA S, WEI M, LIANG J, et al. Evaluation of whiteness metrics[J]. Lighting Research & Technology, 2016, 50(3): 429-445.
[23]	王寒, 徐海松, CUI Giuhau, 等. 基于物体表面色的人眼阈值水平微小色差评价[J]. 光学学报, 2008, 28(8): 1628-1632.
	WANG Han, XU Haisong, CUI Giuhau, et al. Evaluation of very small colour difference at human eye's threshold level based on object surface colours[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2008, 28(8): 1628-1632. doi: 10.3788/AOS20082808.1628
[24]	董振礼, 郑宝海, 轷桂芬, 等. 测色与计算机配色[M]. 3版. 北京: 中国纺织出版社, 2017:74.
	DONG Zhenli, ZHENG Baohai, HU Guifen, et al. Color measurement and computer color matching[M]. 3rd ed. Beijing: China Textile & Apparel Press, 2017: 74.
[25]	HUNTER R S. Description and measurement of white surfaces[J]. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1958, 48(9): 597-605. doi: 10.1364/JOSA.48.000597

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

类别得分	英文描述	中文定义
1	least imaginable	最小程度的
2	very little mildly	很微小程度的
3	mildly	较小程度的
4	moderately	一般的
5	medially	中等的
6	moderately highly	一定程度的
7	mildly highly	较大程度的
8	very highly	很大程度的
9	highest imaginable	最大程度的

指标	误判率W_D/%
指标	最大值	最小值	平均值
准确度	10	7	8
重复性	11	5	7

编号	26	25	4	24	14	…	1
1	-2.47	-2.47	-2.47	-2.47	-2.47	…	0
2	-2.47	-2.47	-2.47	-2.47	-2.47	…	0.43
3	-2.47	-2.47	-2.47	-2.47	-2.47	…	2.47
?	?	?	?	?	?	?	?
28	-2.47	-2.47	-2.47	-2.47	-2.47	…	2.47
平均值	-2.24	-1.93	-1.69	-1.64	-1.55	…	2.12
等级	1	2	3	4	5	…	28

公式	r	W_D/%	ρ	STRESS	总排序
W_Hunter1	0.313(8)	39.7(7)	0.272(8)	74.83(8)	31(8)
W_Hunter2	0.93(1)	10.9(1)	0.922(1)	18.96(1)	4(1)
W_Ganz	0.868(5)	14.6(3)	0.864(4)	26.12(4)	16(4)
W_Grum	0.912(2)	14.6(3)	0.880(3)	21.56(2)	10(2)
W_CIE10	0.91(3)	12.4(2)	0.904(2)	21.58(3)	10(2)
W_Uchida	0.881(4)	16.4(4)	0.862(5)	28.71(5)	18(5)
W_C/V	-0.015(9)	57.9(8)	-0.242(9)	94.64(9)	35(9)
W_UV	0.721(6)	23.8(6)	0.729(7)	59.96(6)	25(6)
W_LAB	0.684(7)	23.3(5)	0.73(6)	66.06(7)	25(6)

白度公式	W_Hunter1	W_Hunter2	W_Ganz	W_Grum	W_CIE10	W_Uchida	W_C/V	W_UV	W_LAB
W_Hunter1		0.06^*	0.12^*	0.08^*	0.08^*	0.15^*	1.6	0.64	0.78
W_Hunter2	15.58^*		1.9	1.29	1.3	2.29^*	24.92^*	10.00^*	12.14^*
W_Ganz	8.21^*	0.53		0.68	0.68	1.21	13.13^*	5.27^*	6.40^*
W_Grum	12.05^*	0.77	1.47		1	1.77	19.27^*	7.73	9.39^*
W_CIE10	12.02^*	0.77	1.47	1		1.77	19.23^*	7.72	9.37^*
W_Uchida	6.79^*	0.44^*	0.83	0.56	0.56		10.87^*	4.36^*	5.29^*
W_C/V	0.63	0.04^*	0.08^*	0.05^*	0.05^*	0.09^*		0.40^*	0.49^*
W_uv	1.56	0.10^*	0.19^*	0.13^*	0.13^*	0.23^*	2.49^*		1.21
W_LAB	1.28	0.08^*	0.16^*	0.11^*	0.11^*	0.19^*	2.05^*	0.82

基于心理物理学实验的非荧光织物白度公式评价

Whiteness formulae evaluation of non-fluorescent fabrics by psychophysical experiments

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 14

参考文献 25

相关文章 1

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

编号	1	2	3	4	5	6	…	28
1		8	0	0	0	10	…	0
2	16		0	0	0	8	…	0
3	24	24		0	16	24	…	0
?	?	?	?	?	?	?	?	?
28	24	24	24	0	24	24	…	0

指标	W_Hunter1	W_Hunter2	W_Ganz	W_Grum	W_CIE10	W_Uchida	W_C/V
r	0.419(8)	0.949(1)	0.914(4)	0.921(3)	0.943(2)	0.848(5)	0.028(9)	0.587(6)	0.562(7)
ρ	0.379(8)	0.951(1)	0.921(3)	0.868(4)	0.941(2)	0.857(5)	-0.064(9)	0.657(7)	0.674(6)
总排序	16(8)	2(1)	7(3)	7(3)	4(2)	10(5)	18(9)	13(6)	13(6)

编号	1	2	3	4	5	6	…	28
1		8	0	0	0	10	…	0
2	16		0	0	0	8	…	0
3	24	24		0	16	24	…	0
?	?	?	?	?	?	?	?	?
28	24	24	24	0	24	24	…	0

编号	1	2	3	4	5	6	…	28
1		8	0	0	0	10	…	0
2	16		0	0	0	8	…	0
3	24	24		0	16	24	…	0
?	?	?	?	?	?	?	?	?
28	24	24	24	0	24	24	…	0