变厚度三维机织复合材料的抗冲击性能

doi:10.13475/j.fzxb.20230404901

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为解决变厚度层合复合材料受到载荷时易分层导致其力学性能变差的问题,使用800 tex玄武岩纱线作为经纬纱,采用分层角联锁结构设计并织造了整体性优异的连续变厚度三维机织物,并采用树脂传递模塑工艺制备了树脂基变厚度三维机织复合材料,同时织造了同纬铺层和同经铺层2种不同结构的层合复合材料进行对比测试。然后对变厚度层合复合材料分别进行25、50、75、100 J的不同冲击能低速冲击实验,并通过单独分析冲击能为100 J时3种复合材料的损伤面积探究其损伤机制。结果表明:在冲击能为25、50、75 J时,变厚度三维机织复合材料与同纬铺层结构复合材料的刚度退化呈现高度一致性,二者抗冲击能力均优于同经铺层结构复合材料,变厚度三维机织复合材料损伤载荷大于2种铺层复合材料;层合材料受到冲击损伤时,因其层间无纱线连接,能量在材料层间传播时消耗,从而产生较大范围的分层损伤;而变厚度三维机织复合材料具有层间连接的经纱,受到冲击时应力在材料经纱连接作用下内部不断传播导致材料整体受载,因此具有更高的损伤容限。

关键词: 变厚度三维织物, 铺层复合材料, 低速冲击, 冲击失效模式, 损伤机制

Abstract:

Objective The production costs of most metal variable thickness plates are high and some composite plates with variable thickness are generally based on laminated composites, which are prone to interfacial delamination and property degradation. This study was designed to solve the problem of delamination of laminated composites, aiming to improve the overall performance against impact.

Method Basalt yarn is a green and environmentally friendly materials. And, it has high strength and excellent durability. Three-dimensional(3-D)variable-thickness fabrics with 3-layered angle interlocking structure change from 9 to 3 layers were designed and woven on a conventional loom using basalt yarns as warp and weft yarns. Resin-impregnated variable-thickness 3-D woven composites were prepared using a vacuum-assisted resin transfer molding (VARTM) process. The variable thickness laminated composites were subjected to low velocity impact tests at 25, 50, 75 and 100 J according to American Society of Testing Materials (ASTM) standards. The damage mechanism of the material was analysed by the damage area at 100 J impact.

Results The 3-D woven variable thickness composites exhibited high consistency in stiffness and stiffness degradation under impact energy of 25, 50 and 75 J compared to the same weft lay-up structure. This was based on the fact that the layers of yarn are interconnected in the 3-D woven variable thickness composites, whereas there was little adhesive action between the the same weft lay-up structure. At the same time, the damage load of the composite with the 3-D woven variable thickness structure was greater than that of the two lay-up composites. This indicated that the composite with the 3-D woven variable thickness structure had a higher damage tolerance and carries more load before damage occurs. At an impact energy of 100 J compared to 25-75 J, the damage load was reduced in a 3-D woven variable thickness structure with co-layered layers. This was due to the large amount of kinetic energy that was instantaneously released by the impact head when a high energy impact occurs. These kinetic energies caused the surface bearing yarns in the material to quickly break and lost their load-bearing capacity. The damage load on the material was reduced because the yarn on the bottom layer of the material had not yet reached a responsive state. When the material was impacted in the forward direction, the damage showed a cross-shaped or rectangular distribution with a greater extension along the weft direction than the material along the warp direction. As the thickness variation of the composite was determined by the number of yarn layers, the energy consumed decreased with the thickness, so that the stress could propagate through the material for a longer period of time. Along the warp direction of the material, the number of layers of material within the same thickness layer remained the same as the thickness, and the stress waves were consumed rapidly, creating a short damage extension range. Damage to the material in the dorsal direction also showed a cross-shaped or rectangular distribution with greater extension along the weft direction than the material along the warp direction. But the damage of the composite material with the same warp-layered structure had slightly less damage along the weft direction than the warp direction. This was because the material encountered a strong impact under the action of 100 J impact energy, the energy of the impact was enough to quickly break through the fabric of all layers of the same layered structure. It completely destroyed the integrity of the material and made the damage to the material more concentrated.

Conclusion Compared with laminar composites, 3-D woven composites of variable thickness have higher damage tolerance and better impact resistance because of the internal warp connection. Compared with the metal variable thickness plate, the variable thickness 3-D woven composite material has the characteristics of low production costs, low manufacturing and maintenance cost of production equipment and low energy consumption. It has reference significance for future application research of variable thickness plate.

Key words: three-dimensional fabric with variable thickness, laminated composite, low speed impact, impact failure mode, damage mechanism

中图分类号:

TB332

吕丽华, 庞现柯, 刘澳. 变厚度三维机织复合材料的抗冲击性能[J]. 纺织学报, 2024, 45(09): 91-96.

LÜ Lihua, PANG Xianke, LIU Ao. Impact properties of three-dimensional woven composites with variable thickness[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2024, 45(09): 91-96.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: http://www.fzxb.org.cn/CN/10.13475/j.fzxb.20230404901

http://www.fzxb.org.cn/CN/Y2024/V45/I09/91

图/表 9

表1

图1

图2

图3

表2

表3

图4

图5

图6

参考文献 13

[1]	王硕. 双金属复合板变厚度冷轧工艺研究[D]. 秦皇岛: 燕山大学, 2019:1-10.
	WANG Shuo. Research on variable thicknes cold rolling technology of bimetal composite plate[D]. Qinhuangdao: Yanshan University, 2019:1-10.
[2]	ALI Mumtaz, NAWAB Yasir, SAOUAB Abdelghani, et al. Fabrication induced spring-back in thermosetting woven composite parts with variable thickness[J]. Journal of Industrial Textiles, 2018, 47(6): 1291-1304.
[3]	WU Weili, WANG Qingtao, ICHENIHI Amos, et al. The effects of hybridization on the flexural performances of carbon/glass interlayer and intralayer composites[J]. Polymers, 2018, 10(5): 549-549.
[4]	LIU Yajun, HUANG Canyi, XIA Hong, et al. Research on development of 3D woven textile-reinforced composites and their flexural behavior[J]. Materials & Design, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.110267.
[5]	刘云志, 战丽, 王争, 等. 柔性导向三维织造复合材料预制体细观结构分析[J]. 中国材料进展, 2020, 39(6): 458-463.
	LIU Yunzhi, ZHAN Li, WANG Zheng, et al. Microstructure analysis of 3D woven preform[J]. Materials China, 2020, 39(6): 458-463.
[6]	王鹏. 变厚度三维机织物的制备与结构分析[D]. 上海: 东华大学, 2012: 10-26.
	WANG Peng. Production and structural analysis of variable thickness 3-D woven fabrics[D]. Shanghai: Donghua University, 2012: 10-26.
[7]	曾文敏. 连续变厚度平面板状三维机织物的研制[D]. 上海: 东华大学, 2015:9-18.
	ZENG Wenmin. Research and development of continuous variable thickness three-dimensional woven fabric[D]. Shanghai: Donghua University, 2015: 9-18.
[8]	曾文敏, 李毓陵, 马颜雪, 等. 连续变厚度三维机织物的组织设计[J]. 产业用纺织品, 2015, 33(6): 6.
	ZENG Wenmin, LI Yuling, MA Yanxue, et al. Structure design of continuous variable thickness three-dimensional woven fabric[J]. Technical Textiles, 2015, 33(6): 6.
[9]	HU Qiaole, ZHANG Yihui, MAO Yanyun, et al. A comparative study on interlaminar properties of l-shaped two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) woven composites[J]. Applied Composite Materials, 2019, 26(3): 723-744. doi: 10.1007/s10443-018-9745-6
[10]	LIU Yajun, XIA Hong, NI Qingqing. Experimental investigation on low-velocity impact performance of 3D woven textile composites[J]. Applied Composite Materials, 2022, 29(1):121-146.
[11]	ZHANG Diantang, GU Yuanhui, ZHANG Zhongwei, et al. Effect of off-axis angle on low-velocity impact and compression after impact damage mechanisms of 3D woven composites[J]. Materials & Design, 2020, 192: 108672-108672.
[12]	NEALE Geoffrey, DAHALE Monali, YOO Sanghyun, et al. Improved crush energy absorption in 3D woven composites by pick density modification[J]. Composites Part B, 2020. DOI:10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108007.
[13]	LIU Ao, ZHOU Xinghai, GAO Yuan, et al. Bendingproperty of novel 3D woven variable thickness composites: experiment and finite element analysis[J]. Polymer Composites, 2023, 44(3): 1993-2004.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

穿入顺序	层数	筘入数/ (根· 筘^-1)	设计宽度/ cm	穿筘数	经纱根数	密度/(根·(10 cm)^-1)
穿入顺序	层数	筘入数/ (根· 筘^-1)	设计宽度/ cm	穿筘数	经纱根数	经密	纬密
1	3	4	2	5	20	100	75
2	4	6	1.2	3	18	150	100
3	5	8	1.2	3	24	200	125
4	6	10	1.2	3	30	250	150
5	7	12	1.2	3	36	300	175
6	8	14	1.2	3	42	350	200
7	9	16	2.8	7	112	400	225
8	8	14	1.2	3	42	350	200
9	7	12	1.2	3	36	300	175
10	6	10	1.2	3	30	250	150
11	5	8	1.2	3	24	200	125
12	4	6	1.2	3	18	150	100
13	3	4	2	5	20	100	75

层数		厚度/mm
层数	三维机织结构	同经铺层(同等经纱根数)结构	同纬铺层(同等纬纱根数)结构
3	1.852±0.23	1.708±0.075	2.008±0.220
4	2.658±0.09	2.094±0.170	2.482±0.130
5	3.240±0.10	2.344±0.085	3.152±0.190
6	3.676±0.11	3.078±0.130	4.156±0.180
7	4.742±0.13	3.836±0.105	5.082±0.065
8	5.264±0.14	4.296±0.075	5.446±0.080
9	5.628±0.07	4.866±0.090	5.972±0.060

预设冲击能/J	落锤质量/kg	落锤高度/mm	冲击速度/ (mm·s^-1)
25	5.102	500	3 131.55
50	7.137	714	3 742.17
75	10.197	750	3 835.35
100	11.217	909	4 222.37