纺织学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (07): 159-164.doi: 10.13475/j.fzxb.20230801101

• 服装工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

充气调温抗浸服的研制与保暖性评价

陈乔丹1, 牛蒙蒙1, 卢业虎1,2()   

  1. 1.苏州大学 纺织与服装工程学院, 江苏 苏州 215006
    2.现代丝绸国家工程实验室, 江苏 苏州 215123
  • 收稿日期:2023-08-03 修回日期:2024-04-02 出版日期:2024-07-15 发布日期:2024-07-15
  • 通讯作者: 卢业虎(1986—),男,教授,博士。主要研究方向为智能与防护服装。E-mail: yhlu@suda.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:陈乔丹(2000—),女,硕士生。主要研究方向为功能服装开发。
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省高等学校基础科学(自然科学)重大项目(21KJA540004);苏州市科技计划项目(SS202147)

Development and thermal insulation evaluation of air inflatable temperature-regulating immersion suit

CHEN Qiaodan1, NIU Mengmeng1, LU Yehu1,2()   

  1. 1. College of Textile and Clothing Engineering, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215006, China
    2. National Engineering Laboratory of Modern Silk, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215123, China
  • Received:2023-08-03 Revised:2024-04-02 Published:2024-07-15 Online:2024-07-15

摘要:

为满足海上作业人员在不同作业环境中对服装保暖性的需求,研制了一种保暖层为气凝胶材料的充气调温抗浸服。采用“Newton”出汗暖体假人测试了在不同保暖材料(气凝胶、丝绵)、压力状态(无压、低压、高压)和充气量(未充气、1/3充气量、2/3充气量、充满气)下的抗浸服总热阻和局部热阻。结果表明:无压条件下,充气调温抗浸服(未充气)的热阻显著高于丝绵抗浸服;随着压力的增大,抗浸服的总热阻和局部热阻均降低,但2件抗浸服的保暖性无显著差异;在施压条件下,充气调温抗浸服随着充气量的增加,服装总热阻显著高于未充气状态的热阻。因此,所制备充气调温抗浸服可动态调节服装的保暖性能。

关键词: 充气服装, 抗浸服, 保暖性, 暖体假人, 充气量

Abstract:

Objective Immersion suit is a type of personal protective equipment to prevent cold shock or even death caused by rapid heat loss when the wearer accidentally falls into cold water, which can effectively prolong the survival time of the wearer. The existing immersion suit has good thermal insulation, but there may be physiological heat load during the non-water state. Therefore, the development of protective clothing capable of dynamically adjusting thermal insulation to provide thermal comfort in different operating environments is necessary. The performance evaluation under pressure conditions is also in demand.

Method An air inflatable temperature-regulating immersion suit was developed, containing an inflatable layer with adjustable static air volume, between the waterproof layer and the aerogel thermal layer. The thermal insulation of the developed air inflatable immersion suit and the commercial immersion suit with polyester wadding were measured and compared using thermal manikin "Newton". The total and local thermal insulations were analyzed under conditions of two thermal insulating materials (aerogel and polyester wadding), three pressure states (no pressure, low pressure, high pressure), and four inflation volumes (CON, 1/3FULL, 2/3FULL and FULL). The thermal insulations were calculated using the parallel method and statistically analyzed using SPSS software.

Results The experimental results showed that the thermal insulating materials had significant effect on the total thermal insulation of immersion suit under no pressure. The thermal insulation of the air inflatable immersion suit was 3.85 clo, which was significantly higher than that of the polyester wadding immersion suit whose a thermal insulation is 3.28 clo (P<0.01). Meanwhile, the total thermal insulation was significantly reduced under high pressure. The thermal insulation of the air inflatable immersion suit was significantly higher than that of the polyester wadding immersion suit at the forearm, chest, abdomen, back, and buttocks (P<0.01), while the differences in other areas were not significant. With the increase of pressure, the total thermal insulation of the immersion suit was decreased, and the reduction rate of air inflatable immersion suit was 11.53% from no pressure to low pressure and 24.40% from low pressure to high pressure, with the reduction rate of thermal insulation from no pressure to high pressure for the commercial immersion suit being 7.05%. The difference of thermal insulation between the two immersion suits was no longer significant. This may be related to the fact that the immersion suit was squeezed, reducing its overall thickness and damaging the warmth wadding and the static air layer underneath the suit. The pressure also reduced the local thermal insulation. Under low pressure, the thermal insulation of the air inflatable immersion suit was decreased less at the upper arm and the back. Under high pressure, the thermal insulation of the abdomen, back and buttocks was decreased remarkably, and there was no longer a significant difference between the two suits at the abdomen and thighs. This result is related to the degree of extrusion of the air layer under the clothing. When the thermal manikin is standing still, there is more air under the clothing in the lumbar and abdominal areas, and less air under the clothing in the shoulders and hips, and consequently a greater decrease in the thermal insulation of the lumbar and abdominal areas when it is extruded by an external force. With the increase of the inflation volume, the total thermal insulation did not change significantly under no pressure, was increased significantly (P<0.05) and then decreased slightly under low pressure and continued to increase under high pressure. This may be be cause of the fact that immersion suit contained a certain air layer between the layers, and the increase in inflation without pressure instead squeezes out the presence of the air layer, and no difference exists in the total thermal insulation. Pressure causes the air layers between layers and underneath the suit to be squeezed, but inflation resists the squeezing of the air layers caused by pressure, so the higher the inflation, the greater the thermal insulation of the suit. However, the inflation volume did not have a consistent pattern of influence on the local thermal insulation for the air inflatable immersion suit.

Conclusion The total thermal insulation and local thermal insulation of the two immersion suits were decreased under pressures, and the reduction was more pronounced as the pressure became higher. The difference between the thermal insulation of the two immersion suits was no longer significant, but the air inflatable immersion suit was still better than the commercial immersion suit. Under pressures, the thermal insulation of the air inflatable immersion suit tended to increase with increasing inflation volume, and the higher is the pressure, the more pronounced is this trend. In summary, compared with the commercial immersion suit, the air inflatable immersion suit provided better thermal insulation and could dynamically adjust under a certain pressure.

Key words: inflatable suit, immersion suit, thermal insulation, thermal manikin, inflation volume

中图分类号: 

  • TS941.73

图1

充气调温抗浸服示意图"

表1

织物层的物理性能"

面料层 面料名称 材质 厚度/
mm
面密度/
(g·m-2)
防水层 防水复合织物 芳纶+PTFE膜 0.51 277.27
潜水面料 双面锦纶/氨纶+SBR 3.10 646.24
防水拉链 TPU
充气层 气密面料 高密度涤纶+TPU膜 3或25 68.00
保暖层 气凝胶面料 气凝胶 19.77 136.33
防水布 锦纶 0.12 64.57

图2

无压状态下抗浸服的局部热阻"

表2

不同压力状态下抗浸服的总热阻"

压力状态 热阻/clo
充气调温抗浸服 丝绵抗浸服
无压 4.132 45 3.317 30
低压 3.656 03
高压 3.124 54 3.086 09

图3

不同压力下抗浸服的局部热阻"

图4

不同充气量下充气调温抗浸服的总热阻"

图5

不同充气量下充气调温抗浸服的局部热阻"

[1] 王慧, 王子琦, 杨健, 等. 抗浸防寒飞行服的研制与开发[J]. 现代工业经济和信息化, 2018, 8(12): 21-23.
WANG Hui, WANG Ziqi, YANG Jian, et al. Research and development of anti-soaking and cold-proof flying suit[J]. Modern Industrial Economy and Informationization, 2018, 8(12): 21-23.
[2] 肖红, 施楣梧. 个体落水救生机理与个体救生具的技术性能要求[J]. 中国个体防护装备, 2004(4): 20-23.
XIAO Hong, SHI Meiwu. Individual overboard rescue mechanism and the technical performance requirements of individual life-saving equipment[J]. China Personal Protective Equipment, 2004(4): 20-23.
[3] 邱婧, 吴国栋, 宋新川, 等. 抗浸防寒飞行服发展综述[J]. 中国个体防护装备, 2022(S1): 80-83.
QIU Jing, WU Guodong, SONG Xinchuan, et al. Review on the development of immersion resistant and cold weather flight suits[J]. China Personal Protective Equipment, 2022(S1): 80-83.
[4] STELLA A B, MORRISON S A. Marine survival in the mediterranean: a pilot study on the cognitive and cardiorespiratory response to sudden cool water immersion[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2022, 19(3):1601.
[5] XUE L H, DING L, ZHANG J, et al. Thermal response of human body with immersion suit in cold environ-ment[J]. International Journal of Biometeorology, 2023, 67(3): 447-456.
[6] 卢业虎, 陈乔丹. 抗浸服性能评价方法研究进展[J]. 服装学报, 2023, 8(2): 141-148.
LU Yehu, CHEN Qiaodan. Research progress on the performance evaluation methods of immersion suits[J]. Journal of Clothing Research, 2023, 8(2): 141-148.
[7] NUCKOLS M, HENKENER J, CHAO J, et al. Manned evaluation of a prototype cold water diving garment using superinsulation aerogel materials[C]// MORRISON D. Proceedings of 25th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering. New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2006: 27-34.
[8] DUCHARME M B. Evaluation of the modified constant wear immersion suit and liners for helicopter aircrew[M]. Ottawa: Defence Research and Development Canada, 2005: 2-5.
[9] ZHANG H, SONG G W. Performance of immersion suits: a literature review[J]. Journal of Industrial Textiles, 2013, 44(2): 288-306.
[10] HALL J F, POLTE J W. Effect of water content and compression on clothing insulation[J]. Journal of Applied Physiology, 1956, 8(5): 539-545.
pmid: 13295171
[11] 赖军, 张梦莹, 张华, 等. 消防服衣下空气层的作用与测定方法研究进展[J]. 纺织学报, 2017, 38(6): 151-156.
LAI Jun, ZHANG Mengying, ZHANG Hua, et al. Research progress on air gap entrapped in firefighters' protective clothing and its measurement methods[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2017, 38(6): 151-156.
[1] 苗雪, 王永进, 王方明. 充气保暖复合面料厚度与热阻的相关性分析[J]. 纺织学报, 2023, 44(11): 176-182.
[2] 张露杨, 宋海波, 孟晶, 殷兰君, 卢业虎. 棉纱布被保暖性能的影响因素[J]. 纺织学报, 2023, 44(07): 79-85.
[3] 苗雪, 王永进, 王方明. 充气保暖服装的充气尺寸变化率测试与应用[J]. 纺织学报, 2022, 43(12): 138-143.
[4] 吴佳玥, 吴巧英. 羽绒制品热传递的有限元仿真[J]. 纺织学报, 2022, 43(11): 154-162.
[5] 江舒, 李俊. 婴儿被服热舒适性研究进展[J]. 纺织学报, 2022, 43(08): 189-196.
[6] 王慧云, 王萍, 李媛媛, 张岩. 中空多孔异形聚丙烯腈纤维的制备及其性能[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(03): 50-55.
[7] 王秋萍, 张瑞萍, 李成红, 张葛成. 导电涤纶非织造布的制备及其性能[J]. 纺织学报, 2020, 41(10): 116-121.
[8] 马颜雪, 王世娜, 李毓陵, 温润. 方格立衬结构机织物的一次成形设计实践[J]. 纺织学报, 2020, 41(06): 42-47.
[9] 苏文桢, 卢业虎, 王方明, 宋文芳. 新型充气夹克的研制与保暖性能评价[J]. 纺织学报, 2020, 41(05): 140-145.
[10] 苏文桢, 宋文芳, 卢业虎, 杨秀月. 充气防寒服的保暖性能[J]. 纺织学报, 2020, 41(02): 115-118.
[11] 胡紫婷, 郑晓慧, 冯铭铭, 王英健, 刘莉, 丁松涛. 衣下空气层对透气型防护服热阻和湿阻的影响[J]. 纺织学报, 2019, 40(11): 145-150.
[12] 万爱兰, 缪旭红, 马丕波, 陈晴, 陈方芳. 功能性纬编斜纹牛仔面料的设计及其性能[J]. 纺织学报, 2019, 40(04): 55-59.
[13] 赵蒙蒙, 柯莹, 王发明, 李俊. 通风服热舒适性研究现状与展望[J]. 纺织学报, 2019, 40(03): 183-188.
[14] 邓辉 师云龙 胡源盛 钱晓明 范金土. 开放式局部热阻测试系统的实现[J]. 纺织学报, 2018, 39(09): 127-133.
[15] 刘新华 储兆洋 李永 郑宏亮. 仔鸭鸭绒的结构与性能[J]. 纺织学报, 2018, 39(08): 27-32.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!