纺织学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (3): 92-97.

• 染整与化学品 • 上一篇    下一篇

棉/粘弹力交织物的生物酶前处理工艺

  

  • 收稿日期:2015-02-15 修回日期:2015-08-11 出版日期:2016-03-15 发布日期:2016-03-16

Biological enzyme pretreatmentprocess for cotton/rayon elastic fabric

  • Received:2015-02-15 Revised:2015-08-11 Online:2016-03-15 Published:2016-03-16

摘要:

为减少织物损伤,降低前处理污水排放浓度和排放量,采用渗透性和乳化性优异的表面活性剂与生物酶结合协同处理坯布,使坯布上的杂质发生生物降解、乳化、增溶,再结合氧漂工艺完成织物的前处理。采用平行试验与正交试验,考察织物的果胶去除率、毛细效应、白度、强力损伤率及排放污水的污染物浓度。结果表明:处理后织物果胶去除率达到89.3%;30min毛细效应为9.5cm;白度为83.95%、;强力损伤率比常规生产的试样小;试样质量符合常规半制品的要求。该生物酶退煮与氧漂工艺产生废水的化学需氧量比常规工艺产生的废水低35.9%,废水的色度下降56倍,废水的pH值下降1.7,减排效果明显。

关键词: 棉/粘胶弹力交织物, 前处理, 生物酶, 节能减排

Abstract:

In order to avoid fabric damage and reduce discharge concentration and quantity of waste water, a biological enzyme pretreatnent process on cotton-rayon elastic fabrics was put forward. Anefficient surfactant with excellent permeability and emulsifying properties was selected to combine withbiological enzyme in the treatment of grey cloth. Therefore, the impurities on grey cloth were degraded, emulsified and solubilized. Then the oxygen bleaching process were conducted in the following pretreatment peocess. The removal rate of pectin, capillary effect, whiteness, strength damage rate and pollutant concentration were investigated by parallel and orthogonal experiments. The results showed that the removal rate of pectin reached 89.3%, capillary effect was 9.5 cm (30min), and the whiteness reached 85.9%. The strength damage rate was less than that of conventional process. The sample quality meet the requirement of the semi-finished peoducts. The COD value of wastewater was 35.9% lower than that produced during regular process. In the meanwhile, color degree reduced by 56 times and pH value decreased by 1.7 in comparison with the conventional process used in factory. The bilogical enzyme pretreatment process gad obvinus effect on emission reduction. 

Key words: cotton/rayon elastic fabric, pretreatment, enzyme, energy conservation and emission reduction

[1] 赵海军,刘志军,王佩军,等。液体室温淀粉酶在前处理中的应用[J],印染,2003,29(08):12~14
[2] 陈颖.生物酶在染整加工中的应用(二)[J],印染,2003,29(12):37~40
[3] 王强,范雪荣.生物酶在棉织物精炼加工中的应用[J].纺织学报,2006,27(8): 113~116。
[4] 徐谷仓.棉织物生物酶前处理工艺[J].染整科技,2004(1):23~25
[5] 袁霞,范雪荣,王强,王平,高卫东.棉织物的生物酶前处理[J].印染助剂,2003(5):17~18
[6] 世界印染网.复合生物酶应用于棉织物前处理的工艺[专题:前处理],2012, 10,08
[7] 侯爱芹,谢孔良,张俊峰,高炳生.棉织物复合生物酶前处理工艺2010(1):1000~4017
[1] 张灵婕 缪旭红 万爱兰 蒋高明 陈方芳. 上浆前处理剂对经编用棉纱性能的影响[J]. 纺织学报, 2018, 39(04): 82-86.
[2] 刘建勇 吴胜争 赵笑康. 生物酶协同催化体系及其对羊毛纤维的作用机制[J]. 纺织学报, 2018, 39(01): 71-78.
[3] 张娟 高世会 施楣梧 郑来久 熊小庆 闫俊. 亚麻粗纱超临界二氧化碳无水煮漂技术研究进展[J]. 纺织学报, 2017, 38(05): 163-169.
[4] 向中林 韩雪梅 刘增祥 许长海. 棉织物低温酶氧一浴前处理工艺[J]. 纺织学报, 2017, 38(05): 80-85.
[5] 崔双双 张艳 高加勇 蒋谨繁 左梦迪 阚璇 许长海. 棉织物低温氧漂活化剂的制备[J]. 纺织学报, 2016, 37(07): 88-92.
[6] 赵文杰 张晓云 钟毅 徐红 毛志平. 棉针织物的冷轧堆前处理与染色[J]. 纺织学报, 2016, 37(06): 76-82.
[7] 韩丽 张占柱. 棉织物冷轧堆前处理氧漂活化剂的制备及其应用[J]. 纺织学报, 2015, 36(06): 64-67.
[8] 胡婷莉 黄健平 阎克路 李戎 王建庆 侯爱芹. 酶氧前处理新工艺节能减排效果评估[J]. 纺织学报, 2014, 35(6): 74-0.
[9] 盛冠忠 蒋少军 钟少锋 楼永平 张奇鹏. 棉秆皮机械-生物酶联合脱胶工艺[J]. 纺织学报, 2013, 34(2): 95-100.
[10] 李鹏 朱亚伟. 保留天然彩色蚕丝纤维中色素的技术探讨[J]. 纺织学报, 2012, 33(12): 5-9.
[11] 金鹏辉;封勤华;蒋耀兴. 生物酶脱胶工艺在制备桑皮纤维中的应用[J]. 纺织学报, 2011, 32(1): 55-58.
[12] 侯爱芹;周民革. 聚乳酸纤维及其纺织品的染整加工[J]. 纺织学报, 2009, 30(9): 141-146.
[13] 段亚峰;庄小雄;潘葵;叶海娜;陈兰兰. 碱减量工艺对抗紫外线涤纶长丝织物抗紫外线功能的影响[J]. 纺织学报, 2009, 30(11): 99-105.
[14] 陆邵闻;王炜;孙国琴. 新型钯-银联合活化电磁屏蔽材料的工艺初探[J]. 纺织学报, 2008, 29(1): 49-53.
[15] 范雪荣;纪惠军;王强;邰文峰. 生物酶处理对亚麻/棉织物杂质的去除作用[J]. 纺织学报, 2006, 27(9): 71-74.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 黄立新. Optim纤维及产品的开发与应用[J]. 纺织学报, 2004, 25(02): 101 -102 .
[2] 汪德潢. 压电陶瓷片式选针装置结构与工作原理[J]. 纺织学报, 2003, 24(06): 52 -53 .
[3] 周燕. 棉锦交织物的染色[J]. 纺织学报, 2004, 25(03): 101 -102 .
[4] 翁晓明. 胶辊改革过程中几个注意问题[J]. 纺织学报, 1987, 8(01): 9 .
[5] 任家智;郁崇文. E7/6型精梳机曲柄半径对工艺性能的影响[J]. 纺织学报, 2004, 25(04): 45 -46 .
[6] 郑帼;孙宇清. 剪切速率对表面活性剂/水体系的作用研究[J]. 纺织学报, 1998, 19(06): 14 -16 .
[7] 毛志勇. 应用二项分布控制梳棉机生条棉结杂质[J]. 纺织学报, 1982, 3(09): 52 -56 .
[8] 姚永毅;朱谱新;胡杰;吴大诚. 平平加O-20单分子膜的解吸扩散系数[J]. 纺织学报, 2005, 26(1): 4 -6 .
[9] 管映亭;董政娥;金志浩. 纳米材料及其在纺织等领域中的应用[J]. 纺织学报, 2004, 25(03): 116 -118 .
[10] 汤加乐;李庆民. 减少纺织品火灾事故的对策初探[J]. 纺织学报, 1986, 7(04): 62 -64 .