纺织学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (05): 177-184.doi: 10.13475/j.fzxb.20180702008

• 综合述评 • 上一篇    

人体着装黏感觉的研究进展

姜茸凡1,2,3, 王云仪1,2()   

  1. 1.东华大学 服装与艺术设计学院, 上海 200051
    2.东华大学 现代服装设计与技术教育部重点实验室,上海 200051
    3.西安工程大学 服装与艺术设计学院, 陕西 西安 710048
  • 收稿日期:2018-07-09 修回日期:2018-11-27 出版日期:2019-05-15 发布日期:2019-05-21
  • 通讯作者: 王云仪
  • 作者简介:姜茸凡(1987—),男,博士生。主要研究方向为服装舒适性与功能设计。

Research progress of stickiness perception of human body in dressing

JIANG Rongfan1,2,3, WANG Yunyi1,2()   

  1. 1. College of Fashion and Design, Donghua University, Shanghai 200051, China
    2. Key Laboratory of Clothing Design and Technology, Ministry of Education, Donghua University, Shanghai 200051, China
    3. School of Apparel and Art Design, Xi'an Polytechnic University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710048, China
  • Received:2018-07-09 Revised:2018-11-27 Online:2019-05-15 Published:2019-05-21
  • Contact: WANG Yunyi

RichHTML

3

PDF (PC)

203

摘要：

为缓解人体在出汗或淋湿状态下的着装黏感觉,基于皮肤机械感受器的类型及其刺激响应特性探究了着装黏感觉的形成机制,通过阐述着装黏感觉的3种评价方法,即物理评价、心理评价和生理评价,研究了各评价方法的优势及局限性,并从3个层面归纳了着装黏感觉的影响因素,包括表面粗糙度、液态水传递性能等织物性能因素,滑移速度、水分等外界刺激因素,及皮肤感知敏感度、皮肤特征等人体皮肤因素。最后指出,未来应通过搭建垂直分离接触装置系统地分析织物及外界刺激对黏感觉的影响,研究有毛皮肤的黏感觉神经生理机制,绘制人体黏感觉图谱,为舒适性面料开发及服装结构优化提供理论依据。

关键词: 黏感觉, 皮肤拉伸变形, 皮肤机械感受器, 服装舒适性, 触觉

Abstract:

In order to attenuate the stickiness perception of dressing in the sweaty or wet state, the formation mechanism of clothing stickiness perception was explored based on the types of skin mechanical sensors and their stimulating response properties. The advantages and limitations of three evaluation methods of the stickiness perception of dressing, namely physical evaluation, psychological evaluation and physiological evaluation, were analyzed. The influence factors on stickiness perception were analyzed from three aspects, including fabric factors about surface roughness and liquid water transfer performance, external stimulation factors about sliding friction and moisture, and human skin factors about perceptual sensitivity and features. It is finally pointed out that in the future the influence of fabric and external stimulus on the stickiness perception should be systematically analyzed by setting up the separation contact device, the neurophysiological mechanism of the stickiness perception on the hairy skin should be studied, and the body map of stickiness perception should be drawn, which provides theoretical basis for the development of comfortable fabrics and optimization of garment structure.

Key words: stickiness perception, skin stretch deformation, cutaneous mechanoreceptors, clothing comfort, tactile perception

中图分类号: 

  • TS941.16

表1

皮肤机械感受器类型"

类型 传导速度/
(m·s-1)		 皮肤类型 感觉末梢
器官		 响应
刺激
SA1 16~96 无毛皮肤 麦克尔小体 轻触、压痕
有毛皮肤 麦克尔小体
(触觉圆顶)
SA2 20~100 无毛皮肤 鲁菲尼小体 拉伸、伸张
有毛皮肤 —
RA1 26~91 无毛皮肤 麦氏触觉小体 皮肤滑移、
毛囊挠曲
有毛皮肤 柳叶刀形神
经纤维末梢
RA2 30~90 无毛皮肤 环层小体 振动

图1

皮肤机械感受器响应特性"

[1] 娄琳. 织物湿态贴附性的表征与建模[D]. 上海: 东华大学, 2016: 1-83.
LOU Lin. The characterization and modelling of the adhesion property of wet fabrics[D]. Shanghai: Donghua University, 2016: 1-83
[2] HOLLIES N R S. Visual and tactile perceptions of textile quality[J]. Journal of The Textile Institute, 1989,80(1):1-18.
doi: 10.1080/00405008908659183
[3] SUKIGARA S, NIWA M. Analysis of ″wet″ sensation for lingerie fabrics[J]. International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology, 1997,9(3):214-219.
doi: 10.1108/09556229710168342
[4] OKAMOTO S, NAGANO H, YAMADA Y. Psychophysical dimensions of tactile perception of textures[J]. Journal of IEEE Transactions on Haptics, 2013,6(1):81-93.
doi: 10.1109/TOH.2012.32 pmid: 24808270
[5] HOLLIES N R S, CUSTES A B, MORIN C J, et al. A human perception analysis approach to clothing comfort[J]. Textile Research Journal, 1979,49:557-564.
[6] CARDELLOA A V, SCHUTZ H G, LESHER L L, et al. Development and testing of a labeled magnitude scale of perceived satiety[J]. Appetite, 2005,44(1):1-13.
pmid: 15604029
[7] STANTON J H, SPEIJERS J, NAYLOR G R S. Skin comfort of base layer knitted garments: part 1: description and evaluation of wearer test protocol[J]. Textile Research Journal, 2014,84(13):1385-1399.
[8] MCGLONE F, REILLY D. The cutaneous sensory system[J]. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 2010,34:148-159.
pmid: 19712693
[9] ABRAIRA V E, GINTY D D. The sensory neurons of touch[J]. Neuron, 2013,79(4):618-639.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.07.051 pmid: 23972592
[10] ZIGLER M J. An experimental study of the perception of clamminess[J]. American Journal of Psychology, 1923,34:73-84.
[11] 苑洁, 于伟东, 陈克敏. 基于功能磁共振的织物触压舒适度脑感知研究进展[J]. 纺织学报, 2017,38(10):146-152.
YUAN Jie, YU Weidong, CHEN Kemin. Brain cognitive characterization of contact pressure comfort of fabrics based on functional magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2017,38(10):146-152.
[12] GWOSDOW A R, STEVENS J C, BERGLUND L G, et al. Skin friction and fabric sensations in neutral and warm environments[J]. Textile Research Journal, 1986,56(9):574-580.
[13] SMITH A M, SCOTT S H. Subjective scaling of smooth surface friction[J]. Journal of Neurophysiology, 1996,75(5):1957-1962.
pmid: 8734594
[14] ARAJ K. Wearing comfort of water absorbent acrylic fibres[J]. Journal of The Textile Machinery Society of Japan, 1984,36(1):33-41.
[15] PRESCOTT T J. Scholarpedia of Touch [M]. Paris: Atlantis Press, 2016: 207-215.
[16] 王旭, 冯向伟, 李亚娟. 织物吸湿性对织物和皮肤间动摩擦力的影响[J]. 纺织学报, 2017,38(12):54-60.
WANG Xu, FENG Xiangwei, LI Yajuan. Influence of fabric hygroscopicity on dynamic friction between fabric and skin[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2017,38(12):54-60.
[17] 李炜, 孔梅, 刘夕东, 等. 汗液对皮肤摩擦特性的影响研究[J]. 摩擦学学报, 2008,28(1):88-92.
LI Wei, KONG Mei, LIU Xidong, et al. Effect of artifical perspiration on tribological properties of human skin[J]. Tribology, 2008,28(1):88-92.
[18] 张元. 夏季服装面料的动态表面润湿性能和粘体感研究[D]. 上海: 东华大学, 2008: 83-84.
ZHANG Yuan. Research on dynamic surface wetness and stickiness of summer fabrics[D]. Shanghai: Donghua University, 2008: 83-84.
[19] YAMAOKA M, YAMAMOTO A, HIGUCHI T. Basic analysis of stickiness sensation for tactile[J]. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2008,46(5):448-454.
[20] JI F, QIU Y P, XIE J F, et al. A novel testing method of the wet wearing comfort ability of fabrics[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2013,627:476-479.
[21] LOU L, JI F, QIU Y P, et al. Simulating adhesion of wet fabrics to water: surface tension-based theoretical model and experimental verification[J]. Textile Research Journal, 2015,85(19):1987-1998.
[22] LOU L, XIE J F, JI F, et al. Simulating adhesion of wet fabrics to water: gravity of liquid bridge-based theoretical model and experimental verification[J]. Textile Research Journal, 2017,87(7):769-779.
[23] WANG G H, ZHANG W Y, POSTLE P, et al. Evaluating wool shirt comfort with wear trials and the forearm test[J]. Textile Research Journal, 2003,73(2):113-119.
[24] DING S Y, BHUSHAN B. Tactile perception of skin and skin cream by friction induced vibrations[J]. Journal of Colloid & Interface Science, 2016,481:131-143.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2016.07.034 pmid: 27474814
[25] TANG K M T, KAN C W, FAN J T. Psychophysical measurement of wet and clingy sensation of fabrics by the volar forearm test[J]. Journal of Sensory Studies, 2015,30(4):329-347.
[26] RACCUGLIA M, PISTAK K, HEYDE C, et al. Human wetness perception of fabrics under dynamic skin contact[J]. Textile Research Journal, 2018,88(19):2155-2168.
[27] 唐香宁, 张昭华, 李俊, 等. 人体皮肤湿感觉的研究进展[J]. 纺织学报, 2017,38(9):174-180.
TANG Xiangning, ZHANG Zhaohua, LI Jun, et al. Research progress of human skin wetness percep-tion[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2017,38(9):174-180.
[28] MAUREEN M S, DONNA H B. Sensorial comfort: part I: a psychophysical method for assessing moisture sensation in clothing[J]. Textile Research Journal, 1990,60(7):371-377.
[29] TANG K M P, KAN C W, FAN J T. Assessing and predicting the subjective wetness sensation of textiles: subjective and objective evaluation[J]. Textile Research Journal, 2015,85(8):838-849.
[30] DOYLE E K, TESTER D, THOMPSON J. A simple sleeve test worn during exercise to quantify skin feel and willingness to pay for wool fabric samples[J]. Textile Research Journal, 2015,85(11):1131-1139.
[31] 刘丽英, 刘林. 服装舒适性主观评价及主客观指标间的相关性研究[J]. 青岛大学学报(工程技术版), 2013,28(3):60-65.
LIU Liying, LIU Lin. Subjective evaluation of clothing comfort and their correlation with laboratory test[J]. Journal of Qingdao University (Engineering & Technology Edition), 2013,28(3):60-65.
[32] PROVANCHER W R, SYLVESTER N D Sylvester. Fingerpad skin stretch increases the perception of virtual friction[J]. IEEE Transactions on Haptics, 2009,2(4):212-223.
doi: 10.1109/TOH.2009.34 pmid: 27788106
[33] BIRZNIEKS I, JENMALM P E R, et al. Encoding of direction of fingertip forces by human tactile afferents[J]. The Journal of Neuroscience, 2001,21(20):8222-8237.
pmid: 11588194
[34] YEON J. The sticky brain: a fMRI study of stick-iness[D]. Korea: Graduate School of UNIST, 2016: 42-49.
[35] YEON J, KIM J, RYU J, et al. Human brain activity related to the tactile perception of stickiness[J]. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2017,11(8):1-13.
[36] KIM J, YEON J, RYU J, et al. Neural activity patterns in the human brain reflect tactile stickiness percep-tion[J]. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2017,11(445):1-12.
[37] 柯薇. 医用压力袜与人体皮肤的接触摩擦行为研究[D]. 上海: 东华大学, 2016: 36-37.
KE Wei. On the friction behaviour of medical compression stockings against human skin[D]. Shanghai: Donghua University, 2016: 36-37.
[38] KENINS P. Influence of fiber type and moisture on measured fabric-to-skin friction[J]. Textile Research Journal, 1994,64(12):722-728.
[39] 唐香宁. 织物与皮肤动态接触下的湿感觉评价[D]. 上海: 东华大学, 2017: 46-47.
TANG Xiangning. Evaluation of skin wetness perception under the dynamic contact between fabric and skin[D]. Shanghai: Donghua University, 2017: 46-47.
[40] TANG K M P, KAN C W, FAN J T. Evaluation of water absorption and transport property of fabrics[J]. Textile Progress, 2014,46(1):75-76.
[41] SCHEURELL D M, SPIVAK S M, HOLLIES NS R S. Dynamic surface wetness of fabrics in relation to clothing comfort[J]. Textile Research Journal, 1985,55(7):394-399.
[42] WANG Y Y, ZHANG Z H, LI J. Effects of inner and outer clothing combinations on firefighter ensembles' thermal-and moisture related comfort levels[J]. The Journal of The Textile Institute, 2013,104(5):530-540.
[43] LOU L, QIU Y P, JI F, et al. The influence of surface hydrophilicity on the adhesion properties of wet fabrics or films to water[J]. Textile Research Journal, 2018,88(1):108-117.
doi: 10.1177/0040517516685276
[44] 孙淑瑶, 纪峰, 王岩, 等. 小应力下织物拉伸和弯曲性能对其湿态贴体性的影响[J]. 纺织学报, 2014,35(8):27-31.
SUN Shuyao, JI Feng, WANG Yan, et al. Impact of fabric tensile and bending properties on adhesion property under wet condition at low tension[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2014,35(8):27-31.
[45] ESSICK G K, SANDER T, YONG M, et al. Capturing the spatial percepts evoked by moving tactile stimuli: a novel approach[J]. Behavioural Brain Research, 2002,135(1):43-49.
doi: 10.1016/S0166-4328(02)00153-5
[46] ESSICK G K, MCGLONE F, DANCER C, et al. Quantitative assessment of pleasant touch[J]. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 2010,34(2):192-203.
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.02.003 pmid: 19896001
[47] FILINGERI D, FOURNET D, HODDER S, et al. Tactile cues significantly modulate the perception of sweat-induced skin wetness independently of the level of physical skin wetness[J]. Journal of Neurophysiology, 2015,113(10):3462-3473.
doi: 10.1152/jn.00141.2015 pmid: 25878153
[48] MCGREGOR B A, STANTON J, BEILBY J, et al. The influence of fiber diameter, fabric attributes and environmental conditions on wetness sensations of next-to-skin knitwear[J]. Textile Research Journal, 2015,85(9):912-928.
[49] GERRETT N, OUZZAHRA Y, COLEBY S, et al. Thermal sensitivity to warmth during rest and exercise: a sex comparison[J]. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 2014,114(7):1451-1462.
doi: 10.1007/s00421-014-2875-0 pmid: 24711078
[50] ASAD R A, YU W D, SIDDIQUI Q, et al. Subjective evaluations of fabric-evoked prickle using the unidimensional rating scale from different body areas[J]. Textile Research Journal, 2016,86(4):350-364.
[51] FILINGERI D, FOURNET D, HODDER S, et al. Body mapping of cutaneous wetness perception across the human torso during thermo-neutral and warm environmental exposures[J]. Journal of Applied Physiology, 2014,117(8):887-897.
doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00535.2014 pmid: 25103965
[52] ACKERLEY R, OLAUSSON H, WESSBERG J. Wetness perception across body sites[J]. Neuroscience Letters, 2012,522(1):73-77.
doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.06.020 pmid: 22710006
[53] CUA A B, WILHELM K P, MAIBACH H I. Skin surface lipid and skin friction-relation to age, sex and anatomical region[J]. Skin Pharmacology & Physiology, 1995,8(5):246-251.
[54] 李炜, 屈树新, 周仲荣. 不同年龄、性别和解剖部位人体皮肤摩擦特性的研究[J]. 生物医学工程学杂志, 2007,24(4):824-828.
pmid: 17899754
LI Wei, QU Shuxin, ZHOU Zhongrong. Frictional properties of human skin at different ages, gender and anatomical regions[J]. Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 2007,24(4):824-828.
pmid: 17899754
[55] RAMALHO A, SZEKERES P, FERNANDES E. Friction and tactile perception of textile fabrics[J]. Tribology International, 2013,63:29-33.
[56] ZHANG M, MAK A F T. In vivo friction properties of human skin[J]. Prosthetics and Orthotics International, 1999,23:135-41.
pmid: 10493141
[57] 王旭, 刘萍, 王府梅. 不同皮肤与织物的摩擦性差异[J]. 纺织学报, 2010,31(3):45-51.
WANG Xu, LIU Ping, WANG Fumei. Fabric friction as affected by different human skin[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2010,31(3):45-51.
[58] GERHARDT L C, STRASSLE V, LENZ A. Influence of epidermal hydration on the friction of human skin against textiles[J]. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 2008,5(28):1317-1328.
doi: 10.1098/rsif.2008.0034
[59] MCGLONE F, OLAUSSON H, BOYLE J A. Touching and feeling: differences in pleasant touch processing between glabrous and hairy skin in humans[J]. European Journal of Neuroscience, 2012,35(11):1782-1788.
doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2012.08092.x pmid: 22594914
[60] ACKERLEY R, SAAL K, MCGLONE F, et al. Quantifying the sensory and emotional perception of touch: differences between glabrous and hairy skin[J]. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 2014,8(34):1-12.
[1] 肖平, 张昭华, 周莹, 刘佳锴, 唐颢源. 手臂活动角度对服装局部热阻的影响[J]. 纺织学报, 2020, 41(02): 109-114.
[2] 刘亚男 丛杉. 可穿戴技术在人体健康监测中的应用进展[J]. 纺织学报, 2018, 39(10): 175-179.
[3] 苑洁 于伟东 陈克敏. 基于功能磁共振的织物接触压舒适度脑感知研究进展[J]. 纺织学报, 2017, 38(10): 146-152.
[4] 唐香宁 张昭华 李俊 李璐瑶 冯姝元 . 人体皮肤湿感觉的研究进展[J]. 纺织学报, 2017, 38(09): 174-180.
[5] 王珊珊 王蕾 朱博 王鸿博. 基于SolidWorks的在职男性颈部三维模型[J]. 纺织学报, 2015, 36(04): 107-112.
[6] 林炜;胡吉永;丁辛. 基于内隐记忆的织物触觉质感属性空间的确定[J]. 纺织学报, 2009, 30(04): 50-54.
[7] 陈益松;徐军;范金土. 暖体假人的出汗模拟方式与测量算法[J]. 纺织学报, 2008, 29(8): 130-134.
[8] 孙菲菲;李俊;韩嘉珅. 基于织物物理性能的服装舒适感觉的评价与预测[J]. 纺织学报, 2006, 27(11): 82-85.
[9] 陈跃华;张庆;张学芳;汤友谊;吴成进. 牛仔裤的风格评价[J]. 纺织学报, 1999, 20(06): 53-55.
[10] 朱利军;张渭源. 国外出汗模拟系统的发展状况[J]. 纺织学报, 1998, 19(05): 62-63.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备14006648号　 京公网安备11010502044800号
版权所有 © 2021 《纺织学报》编辑部
地址： 北京市朝阳区延静里中街3号主楼6层《纺织学报》杂志社　邮政编码：100025　
电话：010-65017711,65917740　传真：010-65016539　Email:fangzhixuebao@vip.126.com
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发