纺织学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (09): 126-130.doi: 10.13475/j.fzxb.20200102105

• 染整与化学品 • 上一篇    下一篇

预处理对棉织物免烫整理效果的影响

程佩1, 傅佳佳1,2, 王蕾1,2, 张建祥1,2, 张凯1,2, 高卫东1()   

  1. 1.生态纺织教育部重点实验室(江南大学), 江苏 无锡 214122
    2.鲁泰纺织股份有限公司, 山东 淄博 255100
  • 收稿日期:2020-01-14 修回日期:2021-04-22 出版日期:2021-09-15 发布日期:2021-09-27
  • 通讯作者: 高卫东
  • 作者简介:程佩(1995—),女,硕士生。主要研究方向为纺织品功能改性。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFB0309200);中国博士后科学基金项目(2019T120390)

Influence of pretreament on anti-wrinkle finishing of cotton fabrics

CHENG Pei1, FU Jiajia1,2, WANG Lei1,2, ZHANG Jianxiang1,2, ZHANG Kai1,2, GAO Weidong1()   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Eco-Textiles (Jiangnan University), Ministry of Education, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214122, China
    2. Lutai Textile Co., Ltd., Zibo, Shandong 255100, China
  • Received:2020-01-14 Revised:2021-04-22 Published:2021-09-15 Online:2021-09-27
  • Contact: GAO Weidong

RichHTML

18

PDF (PC)

112

摘要：

为提高棉织物的免烫效果,采用丝光、液氨、丝光—液氨以及液氨—丝光分别对漂白棉织物进行预处理,并对处理后织物进行潮交联整理,测试了织物的折皱回复性能和拉伸断裂性能,研究了不同预处理工艺对棉织物免烫整理效果的影响。结果表明:液氨处理可提升漂白织物的折皱回复性能和强力;液氨和丝光联合处理的工艺顺序影响处理后棉织物性能,“丝光—液氨”处理对织物折皱性能和强力的提升均高于“液氨—丝光”处理;液氨联合潮交联整理后织物折皱回复角最高,可达270.67°,其强力保留率为77.42%;“丝光—液氨”联合潮交联整理后织物强力保留率最高,可达82.97%,折皱回复角为266.17°;4种预处理联合潮交联可有效提升整理后织物强力保留率,同时达到较好免烫效果。

关键词: 丝光, 液氨, 棉织物, 潮交联, 免烫整理

Abstract:

In order to improve the anti-wrinkle effect of cotton fabrics, the bleached cotton fabrics were pretreated with mercerizing, liquid ammonia, mercerizing-liquid ammonia and liquid ammonia-mercerizing, respectively. Then the fabrics with different pretreatments were subjected to moisture crosslinking finishing. The wrinkle recovery performance and tensile breaking properties of all treated fabrics were tested. The effect of different pretreatments on cotton fabrics and their moisture crosslinking finishing were systematically investigated. The results show that the liquid ammonia treating improves the wrinkle recovery and strength. The order of liquid ammonia treating and mercerizing in combined treatment has a significant effect on the performance of treated fabrics. The improvement in the wrinkle performance and strength of the "mercerizing-liquid ammonia" treatment on bleached cotton fabrics was found greater than that of the "liquid ammonia-mercerizing". Fabrics with single liquid ammonia pretreatment and moisture crosslinking finishing presents the highest wrinkle recovery angle, which reaches 270.67°, and the strength retention rate is 77.42%. Fabrics with the combined mercerizing-liquid ammonia pretreatment and moisture crosslinking finishing have the highest strength retention rate, which is 82.97%, and the wrinkle recovery angle is 266.17°. The four pretreatments combined with moisture crosslinking finishing process offer the potential to improve the strength retention rate of treated cotton fabrics and to maintain satisfied anti-wrinkle performance.

Key words: mercerizing, liquid ammonia, cotton fabric, moisture crosslinking, anti-wrinkle finishing

中图分类号: 

  • TS195.5

表1

不同工艺预处理棉织物的折皱回复性能"

织物处理工艺 折皱回复角(经向+纬向)/(°)
退浆+煮练 101.83
退浆+煮练+漂白 98.67
退浆+煮练+漂白+液氨 126.83
退浆+煮练+漂白+丝光 77.83
退浆+煮练+漂白+丝光+液氨 123.00
退浆+煮练+漂白+液氨+丝光 107.17

表2

不同工艺预处理棉织物的断裂强力比较"

织物处理工艺 经向断裂
强力/N		 强力保
留率*/%		 强力变
化率*/%
退浆+煮练 443.35 — —
退浆+煮练+漂白 415.35 100.00 0.00
退浆+煮练+漂白+液氨 422.40 101.70 1.70
退浆+煮练+漂白+丝光 437.95 105.44 5.44
退浆+煮练+漂白+丝光+液氨 472.25 113.70 13.70
退浆+煮练+漂白+液氨+丝光 423.13 101.87 1.87

表3

潮交联整理后棉织物的折皱回复性能"

潮交联预处理工艺 折皱回复角
(经向+纬向)/(°)		 折皱回复
提升率*/%
退浆+煮练+漂白 259.64 163.14
退浆+煮练+漂白+液氨 270.67 174.32
退浆+煮练+漂白+丝光 257.17 160.64
退浆+煮练+漂白+丝光+液氨 266.17 169.76
退浆+煮练+漂白+液氨+丝光 264.17 167.73

表4

潮交联整理后棉织物的断裂强力"

潮交联预处理工艺 经向断裂
强力/N		 强力保留
率①/%
退浆+煮练+漂白 265.18 63.85
退浆+煮练+漂白+液氨 321.55 77.42
退浆+煮练+漂白+丝光 307.60 74.06
退浆+煮练+漂白+丝光+液氨 344.60 82.97
退浆+煮练+漂白+液氨+丝光 324.50 78.13
[1] 侯文双, 闵洁, 纪峰, 等. 织物紧度和抗皱整理工艺对纯棉机织物折皱回复性的影响[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(1):118-124.
HOU Wenshuang, MIN Jie, JI Feng, et al. Influence of fabric tightness and anti-crease finishing on wrinkle recovery of pure cotton woven fabrics[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2021, 42(1):118-124.
[2] 王海英, 李栋. 棉织物的轧蒸潮态抗皱整理[J]. 纺织学报, 2011, 32(5):91-94.
WANG Haiying, LI Dong. Pad-steam anti-crease finish of cotton fabric[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2011, 32(5):91-94.
[3] 宋慧君, 韩冰, 张建丽. 棉织物的免烫整理[J]. 纺织学报, 2010, 31(12):84-88.
SONG Huijun, HAN Bing, ZHANG Jianli. Durable press finishing of cotton fabrics[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2010, 31(12):84-88.
doi: 10.1177/004051756103100120
[4] 楼卫东. 柔软剂对BTCA免烫整理棉织物性能的影响[J]. 纺织学报, 2007(5):89-91,99.
LOU Weidong. Effect of softeners on the durable press finishing of cotton fabric with BTCA[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2007(5):89-91,99.
[5] NOELINE R, BERTONIERRE, WALTER D K. Effect of scouring/bleaching, caustic mercerization, and liquid ammonia treatment on the pore structure of cotton textile fibers[J]. Textile Research Journal, 1989, 59(2):114-121.
doi: 10.1177/004051758905900209
[6] 阿阳, 周翔, 黄文彧. 液氨/交联处理棉纤维的结构[J]. 印染, 2005, 31(3):1-4.
A Yang, ZHOU Xiang, HUANG Wenyu. Structure of cotton fiber with liquid ammonia/crosslinking treatment[J]. China Dyeing & Finishing, 2005, 31(3):1-4.
[7] 耿彩花, 张昭钰, 李德芹, 等. 整理方式对纯棉色织面料机械性能的影响[J]. 纺织检测与标准, 2016, 2(5):19-22.
GENG Caihua, ZHANG Zhaoyu, LI Deqin, et al. Influence on the mechanical property of pure cotton yarn-dyed fabric by finishing methods[J]. Textile Testing and Standard, 2016, 2(5):19-22.
[8] 徐声祥, 娄江飞, 余圆圆, 等. 强力保护剂在棉织物免烫整理中的应用[J]. 印染, 2018, 44(20):41-44.
XU Shengxiang, LOU Jiangfei, YU Yuanyuan, et al. Application of strength protective agent to non-iron finishing of cotton fabric[J]. China Dyeing & Finishing, 2018, 44(20):41-44.
[9] ROUSSELLE M A, NELSON M L, HASSENBOEHLER C B. Liquid-ammonia and caustic mercerization of cotton fibers: changes in fine structure and mechanical properties[J]. Textile Research Journal, 1976, 46(4):304-310.
doi: 10.1177/004051757604600412
[10] NELSON M L, HASSENBOEHLER C B J, ANDREWS F R J. Mechanical properties of cotton yarns mercerized in liquid ammonia and sodium hydroxide[J]. Textile Research Journal, 1976, 46(12):872-879.
doi: 10.1177/004051757604601204
[11] BUDTOVA T, NAVARD P. Cellulose in NaOH-water based solvents: a review[J]. Cellulose, 2016, 23(1):5-55.
doi: 10.1007/s10570-015-0779-8
[12] HUANG S, WU X, LI P. Diffusion behaviors of liquid ammonia in the cellulose based on molecular dynamics simulation[J]. International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology, 2019, 31(5):705-714.
doi: 10.1108/IJCST-12-2018-0163
[13] SAWADA D. Structure and dynamics of a complex of cellulose with EDA: insights into the action of amines on cellulose[J]. Cellulose, 2013, 20(4):1563-1571.
doi: 10.1007/s10570-013-9974-7
[14] SUN Z, ZHOU X, XING Z. Effect of liquid ammonia treatment on the pore structure of mercerized cotton and its uptake of reactive dyes[J]. Textile Research Journal, 2016, 86(15):1625-1636.
doi: 10.1177/0040517515599746
[15] 周永凯, 范嘉骐. 烧碱和液氨对棉的膨化作用[J]. 北京服装学院学报(自然科学版), 1986(2):96-101.
ZHOU Yongkai, FAN Jiaqi. Swelling functions of caustic soda and liquid ammonia on cotton[J]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Fashion Technology(Natural Science Edition), 1986(2):96-101.
[16] SHUANG H, WU X, LI P. Diffusion behaviors of liquid ammonia in the cellulose based on molecular dynamics simulation[J]. International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology, 2019, 31(5):705-714.
doi: 10.1108/IJCST-12-2018-0163
[1] 张帆, 张国波, 赵宇新, 张儒, 阳海, 王世豪, 汪南方. 催化氧化皂洗在涤纶/棉织物一浴染色中的应用[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(09): 97-103.
[2] 李维斌, 张程, 刘军. 超疏水棉织物制备及其在油水过滤分离中应用[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(08): 109-114.
[3] 郭恒, 黄宏博, 姚金波, 姜会钰, 夏治刚, 王运利. 家庭洗涤对免烫棉织物性能的影响[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(07): 129-136.
[4] 陈小文, 吴伟, 钟毅, 徐红, 毛志平. 棉织物的活性染料低含水率焙蒸固色工艺[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(07): 115-122.
[5] 张华, 张杰, 高燕. 液氨处理对锦纶/棉混纺织物性能的影响[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(06): 128-132.
[6] 赵永芳, 钱建华, 孙丽颖, 彭慧敏, 梅敏. 银纳米线改性棉织物的制备及其性能[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(05): 115-121.
[7] 马亚男, 沈军炎, 骆晓蕾, 张聪, 尚小磊, 刘琳, KRUCINSKA Izabella, 姚菊明. 高效无卤阻燃棉织物的制备及其结构与性能[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(03): 122-129.
[8] 武守营, 张琳萍, 徐红, 钟毅, 毛志平. 金属配合物催化棉织物低温漂白研究进展[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(03): 27-35.
[9] 张滕家璐, 吴伟, 钟毅, 毛志平, 徐红. 平幅前处理对棉针织物染色性能的影响[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(03): 9-13.
[10] 郝尚, 谢源, 翁佳丽, 张维, 姚继明. 溶解刻蚀辅助构建棉织物超疏水表面[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(02): 168-173.
[11] 蔡露, 康佳良, 吕存, 何雪梅. 自交联氟化聚丙烯酸酯乳液的制备及其应用性能[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(02): 161-167.
[12] 侯文双, 闵洁, 纪峰, 张建祥, 苏梦, 何瑞娴. 织物紧度和抗皱整理工艺对纯棉机织物折皱回复性的影响[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(01): 118-124.
[13] 曾凡鑫, 秦宗益, 沈玥莹, 陈园余, 胡铄. 自熄性棉织物的喷涂辅助层层自组装法制备及其阻燃性能[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(01): 103-111.
[14] 张艳艳, 詹璐瑶, 王培, 耿俊昭, 付飞亚, 刘向东. 用无机纳米粒子制备耐久性抗菌棉织物的研究进展[J]. 纺织学报, 2020, 41(11): 174-180.
[15] 王博, 凡力华, 原韵, 殷允杰, 王潮霞. 可拉伸聚吡咯/棉针织物的制备及其储电性能[J]. 纺织学报, 2020, 41(10): 101-106.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备14006648号　 京公网安备11010502044800号
版权所有 © 2021 《纺织学报》编辑部
地址： 北京市朝阳区延静里中街3号主楼6层《纺织学报》杂志社　邮政编码：100025　
电话：010-65017711,65917740　传真：010-65016539　Email:fangzhixuebao@vip.126.com
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发