纺织学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (01): 38-46.doi: 10.13475/j.fzxb.20220702009

• 特约专栏:纺织科技前沿 • 上一篇    下一篇

对抗微重力环境下肌肉骨骼废用性病变的压力服装研究进展

张倩1,2, 牛文鑫3, 姜成华3, 高晶1,2(), 王璐1,2   

  1. 1.东华大学 纺织学院, 上海 201620
    2.东华大学 纺织行业生物医用纺织材料与技术重点实验室, 上海 201620
    3.同济大学附属养志康复医院, 上海 201619
  • 收稿日期:2022-07-07 修回日期:2022-10-23 出版日期:2023-01-15 发布日期:2023-02-16
  • 通讯作者: 高晶(1978—),女,教授,博士。主要研究方向为功能材料及生物医用纺织品。E-mail:gao2001jing@dhu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:张倩(1999—),女,博士生。主要研究方向为生物医用材料。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(31870935)

Research progress in compression garments against musculoskeletal deconditioning in microgravity

ZHANG Qian1,2, NIU Wenxin3, JIANG Chenghua3, GAO Jing1,2(), WANG Lu1,2   

  1. 1. College of Textiles, Donghua University, Shanghai 201620, China
    2. Key Laboratory of Biomedical Textile Materials and Technology in Textile Industry, Donghua University, Shanghai 201620, China
    3. Yangzhi Rehabilitation Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai 201619, China
  • Received:2022-07-07 Revised:2022-10-23 Published:2023-01-15 Online:2023-02-16

摘要:

针对航天员在微重力环境下的肌肉骨骼去重力性适应问题,以人体生物力学与服装功效学为研究背景,介绍了对抗微重力环境的压力服装的研究现状,分析了空间站现用压力服装和文献报道中的原型服装的对抗机制和结构功效特点,总结并完善现有评价方法。研究认为:该类压力服装存在重力加载量不足、性能测试单一的问题,应深入优化纺织成形工艺,探究服装力学性能与人体所需载荷的关系,结合多学科技术,全面评价服装加载功能性、穿着舒适性和人体生理适应性;研发持久稳定、透湿舒适的新型材料,提高评价方法的智能化和准确性以及将该航空压力服装技术转化为卧床患者康复措施是未来的发展方向。

关键词: 微重力, 压力服装, 肌肉骨骼, 防护压力服, 抗荷服, 重力加载服, 航天服

Abstract:

Significance The microgravity environment in space causes human musculoskeletal deconditioning to gravity, triggering a number of physiological changes, such as muscle atrophy and bone loss. Such pathologies affect the ability of astronauts to perform their missions and expose them to a higher risk of fracture and disc herniation upon return to earth. There has been widespread interest and concern about how to combat the adverse pathologies caused by the microgravity environment on the human musculoskeletal system. Compression garment is an important medium for generating mechanical interactions on the human body. The desired pressure can be obtained by adjusting the material and structure of the compression garment. In addition, compression garments are lightweight and compact, which have important advantages in space flight. It is significant to explore the current status of research on compression garment against microgravity environments by using a combination of clothing ergonomics and human biomechanical principles. This will help to guard the health of astronauts and promote the development of human spaceflight technology.
Progress This paper specifically analyzes the countermeasure mechanisms and structural efficacy characteristics of existing compression garments for space stations, such as the penguin suit and gravity loading countermeasure skinsuit (GLCS), and related prototype garments reported in the literature. The study concludes that the current compression garments are classified into tension-pressure and gas-pressure countermeasures. The penguin suit selects elastic tension straps to apply axial load on the body. However, the poor comfort limits its cap ability to apply loads to the body. The GLCS applies bi-directional elastic fabric to balance the axial load and circumferential pressure. It can be seen from the performance evaluation of some GLCS versions that GLCS has cut down its mechanical function while continuously improving its comfort. Other prototypes categorized as tension-pressure garments are based on the principle of providing pressure along the vertical axis of the body. Gas-pressure countermeasures, for example, lower body negative pressure (LBNP) garment uses negative pressure to create a ground reaction force on the bottom of the foot. The energy consumption and bulkiness of LBNP is a problem that needs to be solved. Moreover, some harness-type accessories provide resistance to movement and load on the body by combining with other equipment.
Conclusion and Prospect The key technology for compression garments against microgravity environments is to balance loading functionality and wearing comfort. At the same time, the evaluation of human dressing-related indicators should be strengthened. At present, such compression garments have problems such as insufficient gravity loading and incomplete performance testing. This paper proposes the following countermeasures to solve these problems. On the one hand, the consideration of textile process should be enhanced when fabricating garments. For example, the performance of the garment should be improved by introducing different mechanical properties and other functional yarns. Form different functions in each area of the garment by choosing different molding processes. The relationship between the mechanical properties of garments and the load functions required by the human body should be explored in depth, providing a reliable basis for the preparation of garments. On the other hand, the evaluation of compression garments should include three aspects, i.e., loading functionality, wearing comfort and physiological adaptability. The performance assessment of the mechanical interaction between the garment and the human body should be strengthened. The assessment of the human body's physiological adaptation to garment can be reinforced by introducing simulation technology. The future research direction focuses on three aspects: material process, evaluation system and technology transformation. Researchers can focus on developing new materials that are durable, moisture permeable and comfortable, whilst engineers should concentrate on improving the intelligence and accuracy of evaluation methods. Further, efforts can be made to convert this aerospace technology into rehabilitation measures for bedridden patients.

Key words: microgravity, compression garment, musculoskeletal, protective compression garment, anti-G suit, gravity loading suit, spacesuit

中图分类号: 

  • TS106.5

表1

压力服装的特点"

类别 拉力方向 加压原理 相关服装
拉力
加压型
经向 弹力拉带 企鹅服、躯干加压背带(TCH)
经向 弹簧 可调节重力加载对抗装备(CGLM bodygear)
经向纬向 双弹织物 重力加载对抗皮肤衣(GLCS)
气体
加压型
经向纬向 下体负压 契比斯(Chibis)、重力服
辅助
加压配件
纬向 袖带
经向 太空跑台
束缚系统

图1

企鹅服"

图2

躯干压缩背带"

图3

可调节重力加载对抗装备"

图4

重力加载对抗皮肤衣MKIII"

表2

GLCS主要性能测试结果"

GLCS版本 测试环境 最大加载载荷
(体重百分比)/%
脊柱伸长量/
cm
不适度评分 身体控制评分 其它测试
MKI[37] 抛物线飞行 躯干:100.8
大腿:96.5
小腿:61.5
5 2 穿脱时间
MKIII[36,38] 地面
头低位卧床
脚底:70 0.6 4 关节活动范围
心肺功能测试
MKVI[35,39] 地面
超浮力漂浮
脚底:7~24 1 3.7 3.2 皮肤微生物群
心肺功能测试
肌肉骨骼成像
肌电信号监测
[1] RADOSTIN P, RICHARD S A, ADAM S T, et al. Back pain in outer space[J]. Anesthesiology, 2021, 135(3):384-395.
doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003812 pmid: 33979426
[2] 吕松泽, 李小涛, 王惠娟, 等. 航天失重对人体的生理影响及对抗研究进展[J]. 医学争鸣, 2022, 43(2):86-90.
LÜ Songze, LI Xiaotao, WANG Huijuan, et al. Advances in physiological effects of space weightlessness on human body and its countermeasures[J]. Negative, 2022, 43(2):86-90.
[3] DANIEL K O, SAWAN D, VIGNESH R, et al. Crew-friendly countermeasures against musculoskeletal injuries in aviation and spaceflight[J]. Frontiers in Physiology, 2020. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00837.
doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00837
[4] JOEY M, TAYLOR G, GEORGINA S, et al. The effects of microgravity on bone structure and function[J]. NPJ Microgravity, 2022, 8(1):9.
doi: 10.1038/s41526-022-00194-8 pmid: 35383182
[5] 冯金升, 吴斌, 安春燕, 等. 航天飞行对人体脊柱影响的相关研究[J]. 颈腰痛杂志, 2020, 41(3):365-367.
FENG Jinsheng, WU Bin, AN Chunyan, et al. Studies related to the effects of space flight on the human spine[J]. The Journal of Cervicodynia and Lumbodynia, 2020, 41(3):365-367.
[6] JOANNE G. Compression garments 101[J]. Plastic Surgical Nuersing, 2007, 27(2):73-77.
[7] 徐水红, 闫利, 马爱军, 等. 航天特因环境影响及有关选拔训练项目和模拟方法[J]. 航天器环境工程, 2019, 36(1):1-6.
XU Shuihong, YAN Li, MA Aijun, et al. The space special environments, the selection & training programs and the environmental simulation method[J]. Spacecraft Environment Engineering, 2019, 36(1):1-6.
[8] 张万欣, 李潭秋, 尚坤, 等. 航天服压力防护技术发展与构想[J]. 航天医学与医学工程, 2018, 31(2):121-130.
ZHANG Wanxin, LI Tanqiu, SHANG Kun, et al. Developments and conceptions of pressure protection technology in spacesuit[J]. Space Medicine & Medical Engineering, 2018, 31(2):121-130.
[9] WESSENDORF A M, NEWMAN D J. Dynamic understanding of human-skin movement and strain-field analysis[J]. IEEE Transactions on Bio-medical Engineering, 2012, 59(12):3432-3438.
doi: 10.1109/TBME.2012.2215859 pmid: 22961262
[10] NEWMAN D J, CANINA M, TROTTI G L. Revolutionary design for astronaut exploration-beyond the bio-suit system[J]. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2007, 880(1):975-986.
[11] OBROPTA E W, NEWMAN D J. A comparison of human skin strain fields of the elbow joint for mechanical counter pressure space suit development[C]// IEEE Aerospace Conference. Big Sky: IEEE, 2015:1-9.
[12] OBROPTA E W, NEWMAN D J. Skin strain fields at the shoulder joint for mechanical counter pressure space suit development[C]// IEEE Aerospace Conference. Big Sky: IEEE, 2016:1-9.
[13] JORGE B, FRANCISCOR S, JAVIER A S F, et al. In vivo measurement of surface skin strain during human gait to improve the design of rehabilitation devices[J]. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, 2019, 22(15):1219-1228.
doi: 10.1080/10255842.2019.1655549
[14] PORTER A P, MARCHESINI B, POTRYASILOVA I, et al. Soft exoskeleton knee prototype for advanced space suits and planetary exploration[C]// IEEE Aerospace Conference. Big Sky: IEEE, 2020:7-14.
[15] 郑嵘, 刘志鹏, 陈晴, 等. 基于机械反压航天服的人体手臂非延长线网络绘制方法研究[J]. 载人航天, 2022, 28(2):159-167.
ZHENG Rong, LIU Zhipeng, CHEN Qing, et al. Research on LoNEs drawing method of human arm for MCP space suit development[J]. Manned Spaceflight, 2022, 28(2):159-167.
[16] 刘亚楠, 贾镇远. 抗荷服的发展综述[J]. 甘肃科技, 2015, 31(18):15-16.
LIU Yanan, JIA Zhenyuan. An overview of the development of anti-charge clothing[J]. Gansu Science and Technology, 2015, 31(18):15-16.
[17] 王红, 李宝辉, 张立辉, 等. 新型综合抗荷措施对快增长率模式高过载暴露防护效果的研究[J]. 空军医学杂志, 2020, 36(5):376-380.
WANG Hong, LI Baohui, ZHANG Lihui, et al. The rapid onset rate high G protection effect of a new integrated anti-G measures[J]. Medical Journal of Air Force, 2020, 36(5):376-380.
[18] KOZLOVSKAYA I B, GRIGORIEV A I, STEPANTZOV V I. Countermeasure of the negative effects of weightlessness on physical systems in long-term space flights[J]. Acta Astronautica, 1995, 36(8):661-668.
doi: 10.1016/0094-5765(95)00156-5
[19] ARTILES D A, TRIGG C, JETHANI H, et al. Physiological and comfort assessment of the gravity loading countermeasure skinsuit during exercise[C]// IEEE Aerospace Conference. Big Sky: IEEE, 2016:1-10.
[20] KOZLOVSKAYA I B, GRIGORIEV A I. Russian system of countermeasures on board of the International Space Station (ISS): the first results[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2004, 55(3):233-237.
doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2004.05.049
[21] OHIRA Y, YOSHINAGE T, NONAKA I, et al. Histochemical responses of human soleus muscle fibers to long-term bedrest with or without counter-measures[J]. The Japanese Journal of Physiology, 2000, 50(1):41-47.
doi: 10.2170/jjphysiol.50.41
[22] 李志利, 姜世忠. 长期失重生理效应体育锻炼防护措施研究进展[J]. 载人航天, 2011, 17(1):23-27.
LI Zhili, JIANG Shizhong. Development of physical exercise countermeasures for physiological decrements associated with long duration weightlessness[J]. Manned Spaceflight, 2011, 17(1):23-27.
[23] YARMANOVA E N, KOZLOVSKAYA I B, KHIMORODA N N, et al. Evolution of Russian microgravity countermeasures[J]. Aerospace Medicine and Human Performance, 2015, 86(12):32-37.
doi: 10.3357/AMHP.EC05.2015
[24] SEMENOVA K A. Basis for a method of dynamic proprioceptive correction in the restorative treatment of patients with residual-stage infantile cerebral palsy[J]. Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology, 1997, 27(6):639-643.
doi: 10.1007/BF02461920 pmid: 9406213
[25] YAMASHITA K, OKUYAMA R, HONDA M, et al. Maximal and submaximal forces of slow fibers in human soleus after bed rest[J]. Journal of Applied Physiology, 2001, 91(1):417-424.
doi: 10.1152/jappl.2001.91.1.417
[26] KOZLOVSKAYA I B, YARMANOVA E N, YEGOROV A D, et al. Russian countermeasure systems for adverse effects of microgravity on long-duration ISS flights[J]. Aerospace Medicine and Human Performance, 2015, 86(12):24-31.
doi: 10.3357/AMHP.EC04.2015
[27] KOZLOVSKAYA I B, YARMANOVA E N, FOMINA E V. The Russian system of preventive countermeasures: its present and future[J]. Human Physiology, 2015, 41(7):704-711.
doi: 10.1134/S0362119715070075
[28] BOGOMOLOV V V, GRIGORIEV A I, KOZLOVSKAYA I B. The russian experience in medical care and health maintenance of the international space station crews[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2006, 60(4):237-246.
doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2006.08.014
[29] GREENA D A, SCOTT J P R. Spinal health during unloading and reloading associated with spaceflight[J]. Frontiers in Physiology, 2017. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2017.01126.
doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.01126
[30] SAYSON J V, LOTZ J, PARAZYNSKI S, et al. Back pain in space and post-flight spine injury: mechanisms and countermeasure development[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2013, 86:24-38.
doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2012.05.016
[31] PEIHONG C, SHINJI K, BRANDON B R, et al. Exercise within lower body negative pressure partially counteracts lumbar spine deconditioning associated with 28-day bed rest[J]. Journal of Applied Physiology, 2005, 99(1):39-44.
pmid: 15761083
[32] SHANKHWAR V, SINGH D, DEEPAK K K. Effect of novel designed bodygear on gastrocnemius and soleus muscles during stepping in human body[J]. Microgravity Science and Technology, 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s12217-021-09870-y.
doi: 10.1007/s12217-021-09870-y
[33] SHANKHWAR V, SINGH D, DEEPAK K K. Effect of countermeasure bodygear on cardiac-vascular-respiratory coupling during 6-degree head-down tilt: an earth-based microgravity study[J]. Life Sciences in Space Research, 2022, 32:45-53.
doi: 10.1016/j.lssr.2021.10.004 pmid: 35065760
[34] SHANKHWAR V, SINGH D, DEEPAK K K. Characterization of electromyographical signals from biceps and rectus femoris muscles to evaluate the performance of squats coupled with countermeasure gravitational load modulating bodygear[J]. Microgravity Science and Technology, 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s12217-021-09899-z.
doi: 10.1007/s12217-021-09899-z
[35] BELLISLE R, NEWMAN D. Countermeasure suits for spaceflight[C]// International Conference on Environmental System. Sydney: ICES, 2020:1-12.
[36] ATTIAS J, PHILIP A T C, WALDIE J, et al. The gravity-loading countermeasure skinsuit (GLCS) and its effect upon aerobic exercise performance[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2017, 132:111-116.
doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2016.12.001
[37] WALDIE J M, NEWMAN D J. A gravity loading countermeasure skinsuit[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2010, 68(7):772-730.
[38] CARVIL P A, JULIA A, SIMON E, et al. The effect of the gravity loading countermeasure skinsuit upon movement and strength[J]. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 2017, 31(1):154-161.
doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001460 pmid: 27135470
[39] STABLER R A, HELENA R, RONAN D, et al. Impact of the Mk VI skinsuit on skin microbiota of terrestrial volunteers and an international space station-bound astronaut[J]. NPJ Microgravity, 2017. DOI: 10.1038/s41526-017-0029-5.
doi: 10.1038/s41526-017-0029-5
[40] 孙喜庆, 姚永杰, 吴兴裕, 等. 下体负压裤的研制与应用[J]. 中华航空航天医学杂志, 2001(1):57-59.
SUN Xiqing, YAO Yongjie, WU Xingyu, et al. Development and application of lower body negative pressure suit[J]. Chinese Journal of Aerospace Medicine, 2001(1):57-59.
[41] CAMOBELL M R, CHARLES J B. Historical review of lower body negative pressure research in space medicine[J]. Aerospace Medicine and Human Performance, 2015, 86(7):633-640.
doi: 10.3357/AMHP.4246.2015 pmid: 26102144
[42] PETERSEN L G, HARGENS A, BIRD E M, et al. Mobile lower body negative pressure suit as an integrative countermeasure for spaceflight[J]. Aerospace Medicine and Human Performance, 2019, 90(12):993-999.
doi: 10.3357/AMHP.5408.2019 pmid: 31747995
[43] NEEKI A, HARGENS A. The mobile lower body negative pressure gravity suit for long-duration spaceflight[J]. Frontiers in Physiology, 2020. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00977.
doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00977
[44] 张浩. 微重力环境下对抗骨质疏松的生物力学机理模拟研究[D]. 天津: 天津理工大学, 2022:53-54.
ZHANG Hao. Simulation study on biomechanical mechanism of fighting osteoporosis in microgravity[D]. Tianjin: Tianjin University of Technology, 2022: 53-54.
[45] THEO F, CORENTIN G, LAURENCE S, et al. Early deconditioning of human skeletal muscles and the effects of a thigh cuff countermeasure[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2021. DOI: 10.3390/ijms222112064.
doi: 10.3390/ijms222112064
[46] THERESE L M, LAURA P, PETER F, et al. DI-5-cuffs: bone remodelling and associated metabolism markers in humans after five days of dry immersion to simulate microgravity[J]. Frontiers in Physiology, 2022. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2022.801448.
doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.801448
[47] LAZZARI A T, ARIA K M, RICHARD M. Neurosurgery and spinal adaptations in spaceflight: a literature review[J]. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.106755.
doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.106755
[48] 苗龙龙. 太空跑台造型设计与研究[D]. 太原: 太原理工大学, 2016:11.
MIAO Longlong. The research and form design of space treadmill[D]. Taiyuan: Taiyuan University of Technology, 2016:11.
[49] ENGLISH K L, BLOOMBERG J J, MULAVARA A P, et al. Exercise countermeasures to neuromuscular deconditioning in spaceflight[J]. Comprehensive Physiology, 2019, 10(1):171-196.
doi: 10.1002/cphy.c190005 pmid: 31853963
[50] 金贵玉, 程伟. 服装压力舒适性主要影响因素和压力测量方法[J]. 针织工业, 2022(5):75-79.
JING Guiyu, CHENG Wei. Main factors affecting clothing pressure comfort and measurement methods[J]. Knitting Industries, 2022(5):75-79.
[51] CORLETT E N, BISHOP R P. A technique for assessing postural discomfort[J]. Ergonomics, 1976, 19(2):175-182.
pmid: 1278144
[52] BORG G A. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion[J]. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 1982, 14(5):377-381.
pmid: 7154893
[1] 戴家木, 聂渡, 李素英, 张瑜, 张伟, 刘蓉. 纤维基人工神经导管的研究进展[J]. 纺织学报, 2022, 43(12): 190-196.
[2] 闵小豹, 潘志娟. 生物质纤维/菠萝叶纤维多组分混纺纱线的品质与性能[J]. 纺织学报, 2022, 43(01): 74-79.
[3] 高强, 王晓, 郭亚杰, 陈茹, 魏菊. 棉基Ti3C2Tx油水分离膜的制备及其性能[J]. 纺织学报, 2022, 43(01): 172-177.
[4] 丁许, 孙颖, 罗敏, 王兴泽, 陈利, 陈光伟. 航天器用高性能纤维编织绳索研究进展[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(12): 180-187.
[5] 王璐, 丁笑君, 夏馨, 王虹, 周小红. SiO2气凝胶/芳纶非织造布复合织物的防护功能[J]. 纺织学报, 2019, 40(10): 79-84.
[6] 李强林, 黄方千, 肖秀婵, 邱诚, 吴菊珍. 新型无卤聚合物阻燃剂的研究进展[J]. 纺织学报, 2019, 40(04): 177-184.
[7] 赵青华, 毛秦岑, 梅涛, 牛应买, 王栋. 阻燃剂对聚氯乙烯/聚酯复合材料性能的影响[J]. 纺织学报, 2019, 40(01): 103-107.
[8] 张小萍 王君泽. 二步法三维编织物仿真模型研究[J]. 纺织学报, 2011, 32(10): 147-.
[9] 张小萍;王君泽. 基于Web的三维编织物仿真系统研制[J]. 纺织学报, 2010, 31(2): 129-132.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!