纺织学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (10): 39-47.doi: 10.13475/j.fzxb.20230701801

• 纺织工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

压缩籽棉对棉籽破碎率及纤维品质的影响

魏喜梅1, 张莹洁2, 张宏文1,3(), 王军1,4, 王蒙1,4   

  1. 1.石河子大学 机械电气工程学院, 新疆 石河子 832000
    2.南京师范大学 电气与自动化工程学院,江苏 南京 210023
    3.石河子大学 农业农村部西北农业装备重点实验室, 新疆 石河子 832000
    4.石河子大学 棉花生产技术现代化省部共建协同创新中心, 新疆 石河子 832000
  • 收稿日期:2023-08-15 修回日期:2024-06-06 出版日期:2024-10-15 发布日期:2024-10-22
  • 通讯作者: 张宏文(1969—),男,教授,博士。研究方向为农业机械设计及机械系统仿真。E-mail:zhw_mac@shzu.edu.com。
  • 作者简介:魏喜梅(1996—),女,博士生。主要研究方向为机械设计及理论。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(32260435);兵团重点领域创新团队建设项目(2019CB006);石河子大学青年创新人才计划项目(CXPY202120)

Effect of compression parameters on cottonseed crushing rate and cotton fiber quality

WEI Ximei1, ZHANG Yingjie2, ZHANG Hongwen1,3(), WANG Jun1,4, WANG Meng1,4   

  1. 1. College of Mechanical Electrical Engineering, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang 832000, China
    2. School of Electrical and Automation Engineering, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210023, China
    3. Key Laboratory of Northwest Agricultural Equipment, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Shihezi, Xinjiang 832000, China
    4. Collaborative Innovation Center of Province-Ministry Co-Construction for Cotton Modernization Production Technology, Shihezi, Xinjiang 832000, China
  • Received:2023-08-15 Revised:2024-06-06 Published:2024-10-15 Online:2024-10-22

RichHTML

2

PDF (PC)

20

摘要：

为探究压缩对籽棉品质的影响因素与规律,以含水率、含杂率及压缩密度为试验因素,以棉籽破碎率、纤维长度、马克隆值、伸长率、反射率、黄度、整齐度、纤维强度为指标进行研究。结果表明:含水率、含杂率及压缩密度对棉籽破碎率影响显著(P<0.05),棉籽破碎率随压缩密度增大而增大,随含水率增加而降低;压缩密度仅对棉籽破碎率和反射率有显著影响(P<0.05);纤维长度随压缩密度、含水率增加而增加,随含杂率增加而减小;马克隆值随含杂率及含水率增加而增加,随压缩密度增加而减小;伸长率随含杂率增加而增加,随压缩密度及含水率增加而减小;反射率随压缩密度增大而增大,随含杂率增大而减小;黄度随含杂率增加而降低,随含水率增大而增大。

关键词: 纤维品质, 棉籽破碎率, 压缩密度, 含水率, 含杂率, 机采籽棉

Abstract:

Objective Machine-harvested seed cotton always undergoes compression and baling procedure to augment fiber packing density and diminish volume, thereby enhancing the efficiency of cotton transportation and storage. However, determining an optimal range for compression parameters, then ensuring minimal damage to the cottonseed and maximal preservation of cotton fiber quality, holds significant importance for cotton production. Therefore, it is imperative to investigate the morphology of the compressed cottonseed and the cotton fiber quality.

Method To determine the primary and secondary relationship and the influence law of the compression parameters on the seed cotton quality, this study took the moisture content, trash content and compression density as the factors, and the cotton seed crushing rate, fiber length, micronaire value, elongation, reflectance (Rd), yellowness (+b), uniformity, and fiber strength as the indexes. Machine-harvested seed cotton was obtained through the cotton picking performance test, the cotton was compressed through the compression equipment, and the compressed cottonseeds and cotton fibers were obtained through ginning. The compressed cottonseed was chemically defluffed and dried to obtain the polished cottonseed, which was observed and screened with a microscope to obtain the cottonseed crushing rate; the compressed cotton fiber was sent to the testing laboratory to obtain the cotton fiber quality test results.

Results The results of variance analysis indicate that the order of the affecting factors of the crushing rate of cottonseed after compression is compression density, moisture content, and trash content. The order for fiber length is trash content, moisture content, and compression density. The order for micronaire value is moisture content, trash content, and compression density. The order for the elongation was moisture content, trash content, and compression density. The order for reflectivity was moisture content, trash content, and compression density. The order for yellowness was trash content, moisture content, and compression density. The order for uniformity was trash content, compression density, and moisture content. The order for fiber strength was compression density, trash content, and moisture content. The effect of moisture content, trash content, and compression density on cotton seed crushing rate was significant (P<0.05). The cotton seed crushing rate increased with increasing compression density, and decreased with in-creasing moisture content at a higher compression density. Trash content had no significant effect (P>0.05) on uniformity, fiber strength, elongation, reflectance. And compression density only had a significant effect (P<0.05) on cottonseed crushing rate and reflectance. Fiber length increased with increasing compression density and increasing moisture content, but decreased with increasing trash content. The micronaire value increased with the increase of trash content, decreased with the increase of compression density, and increased with the increase of moisture content. Elongation increased with increasing trash content, decreased with increasing compression density, and decreased slowly with increasing moisture content. The reflection rate increased with increasing compression density and decreased with increasing moisture content. The cottonseed crushing rate is the smallest when the moisture content is 14%, the trash content is 16%, and the compression density is 200 kg/m3. The maximum fiber length is obtained when the moisture content is 14%, the trash content is 8% and the compression density is 400 kg/m3. The elongation is minimized when the moisture content is 14%, the trash content is 8%, and the compression density is 400 kg/m3. The reflectance is minimized when the moisture content is 14%, the trash content is 8%, and the compression density is 200 kg/m3. The minimum yellowness is obtained when the moisture content is 6%, the trash content is 16%, and the compression density is 200 kg/m3. The micronaire value is between 4.50 and 4.90, which is at the standard level.

Conclusion Finally, we obtained that under the premise of ensuring higher compression density, increasing moisture content and trash content can ensure a smaller cotton seed crushing rate, while increasing moisture content will lead to a decrease in elongation, and increasing trash content will reduce fiber length and increase reflectivity. The research results have certain theoretical value for the determination of the working conditions of cotton picker and the design and selection of the parameters of compression molding device of cotton picker.

Key words: fiber quality, cottonseed crushing rate, compression density, moisture content, trash content, machine-harvested seed cotton

中图分类号: 

  • TS101

表1

测试因子和水平编码表"

水平 含水率X1/% 含杂率X2/% 压缩密度X3/(kg·m-3)
-1 6 8 200
0 10 12 300
1 14 16 400

图1

籽棉加工工艺流程"

图2

棉籽损伤测定"

表2

试验设计与结果"

样品
编号		 X1 X2 X3 棉籽
破碎率/%		 棉纤维品质
长度/mm 整齐度/% 断裂强度/
(N·mm-2)		 马克隆值 断裂伸长
率/%		 反射率/% 黄度
1 -1 -1 -1 2.34 28.72 81.33 26.74 4.61 6.75 65.43 8.63
2 -1 -1 0 4.76 29.57 82.45 27.50 4.33 6.40 66.05 8.38
3 -1 -1 1 12.91 29.03 81.93 27.19 4.51 6.50 65.80 8.70
4 -1 0 -1 1.68 29.36 82.73 27.64 4.68 6.60 64.45 8.43
5 -1 0 0 3.75 29.15 83.30 26.98 4.53 6.50 64.83 8.13
6 -1 0 1 11.46 28.85 82.33 27.48 4.55 6.50 66.88 8.48
7 -1 1 -1 1.04 29.00 82.40 27.21 4.68 6.68 64.20 8.03
8 -1 1 0 3.83 28.60 82.30 27.94 4.55 7.00 65.30 8.18
9 -1 1 1 10.63 28.61 81.50 26.71 4.60 6.78 68.43 8.23
10 0 -1 -1 1.86 29.19 82.13 26.99 4.76 6.68 63.58 8.63
11 0 -1 0 4.56 29.06 82.20 27.53 4.58 6.43 64.83 8.80
12 0 -1 1 10.61 29.93 82.98 26.76 4.56 6.40 66.05 8.58
13 0 0 -1 1.58 29.05 82.35 26.97 4.51 6.70 64.35 8.48
14 0 0 0 4.25 28.95 82.35 27.78 4.65 6.55 65.43 8.65
15 0 0 1 9.99 29.82 83.20 28.19 4.62 6.75 65.03 8.40
16 0 1 -1 1.42 29.18 82.70 27.35 4.77 6.83 62.83 8.33
17 0 1 0 3.28 28.88 82.48 27.00 4.81 6.48 64.85 8.25
18 0 1 1 6.73 28.80 81.50 26.79 4.77 6.48 65.60 8.50
19 1 -1 -1 1.98 29.17 82.30 27.59 4.54 6.58 62.95 9.23
20 1 -1 0 3.88 30.15 82.18 27.44 4.70 6.25 63.78 8.65
21 1 -1 1 9.11 29.84 82.88 27.20 4.64 6.18 64.33 8.95
22 1 0 -1 1.71 29.07 82.73 27.19 4.65 6.43 62.18 9.05
23 1 0 0 3.48 29.57 83.18 27.30 4.75 6.20 64.03 8.68
24 1 0 1 8.50 29.69 83.03 27.73 4.67 6.35 64.23 8.60
25 1 1 -1 0.45 28.62 81.98 27.61 4.77 6.33 64.75 8.00
26 1 1 0 1.45 29.30 81.83 27.06 4.69 6.70 63.98 9.08
27 1 1 1 8.16 29.41 82.73 27.59 4.72 6.53 65.90 8.23

表3

方差分析结果"

指标 含水率 含杂率 压缩密度
F值 P值 F值 P值 F值 P值
棉籽破碎率 1.539 0.219 1.891 0.156 422.298 0.000**
长度 3.859 0.024* 4.544 0.013* 1.982 0.143
整齐度 0.465 0.630 2.515 0.086 0.214 0.808
断裂强度 0.144 0.866 0.294 0.746 0.207 0.814
马克隆值 4.933 0.009** 3.314 0.040* 0.921 0.401
断裂伸长率 4.143 0.019* 2.849 0.062 0.811 0.447
反射率 3.140 0.047* 0.248 0.781 4.144 0.019*
黄度 5.721 0.004** 7.282 0.001** 0.005 0.995

表4

相关性分析"

因素 破碎率 长度 整齐度 断裂强度 马克隆值 断裂伸长率 反射率 黄度
含水率 -0.169 0.428* 0.227 0.159 0.466** -0.504** -0.543** 0.481*
含杂率 -0.185 -0.464** -0.085 0.038 0.483* 0.382* 0.108 -0.545**
压缩密度 0.912** 0.286 0.126 0.042 -0.141 -0.259 0.625** -0.021

图3

棉籽破碎率响应曲面图"

图4

纤维长度响应曲面图"

图5

马克隆值响应曲面图"

图6

断裂伸长率响应曲面图"

图7

反射率响应曲面图"

图8

黄度响应曲面图"

[1] TIAN J S, ZHANG X Y, YANG Y L, et al. How to reduce cotton fiber damage in the Xinjiang China[J]. Industrial Crops and Products, 2017, 109: 803-811.
[2] BILALIS D, PATSIALI S, KARKANIS A, et al. Effects of cultural system (organic and conventional) on growth and fiber quality of two cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) varieties[J]. Renewable Agriculture & Food Systems, 2010, 25(3):228-235.
[3] HOU X, FAN J, HU W, et al. Optimal irrigation amount and nitrogen rate improved seed cotton yield while maintaining fiber quality of drip-fertigated cotton in northwest China[J]. Industrial Crops and Products, 20210. DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.113710.
[4] PAPASTYLIANOU P T, ARGYROKASTRITIS I G. Effect of limited drip irrigation regime on yield, yield components, and fiber quality of cotton under Mediterranean conditions[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2014, 142:127-134.
[5] SLUIJS M H V D, LONG R L, BANGE M P. Comparing cotton fiber quality from conventional and round module harvesting methods[J]. Textile Research Journal. 2015, 85(9): 987-997.
[6] DELHOM C D, INDEST M O, WANJURA J D, et al. Effects of harvesting and ginning practices on southern high plains cotton: textile quality[J]. Textile Research Journal, 2019, 90(5/6): 537-546.
[7] AFZAL I, KAMRAN M, BASRA S M A, et al. Harvesting and post-harvest management approaches for preserving cottonseed quality[J]. Industrial Crops and Products, 2020. DOI:org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112842.
[8] 陈廷官, 张宏文, 王磊, 等. 水平摘锭式采棉机采摘机构运动特性研究与试验[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2020, 41(2): 19-25.
doi: 10.13733/j.jcam.issn.2095-5553.2020.02.04
CHEN Tingguan, ZHANG Hongwen, WANG Lei, et al. Optimization and experiments of picking head transmission system of horizontal spindle type cotton picker[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2020, 41(2): 19-25.
[9] 李勇, 张宏文, 杨涛. 棉花收获期棉絮分离力的试验研究[J]. 石河子大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 29(5): 633-636.
LI Yong, ZHANG Hongwen, YANG Tao. Batt and fibber's detaching force during cotton harvest-time[J]. Journal of Shihezi University (Natural Science), 2011, 29(5): 633-636.
[10] 张龙唱, 张宏文, 王磊, 等. 不同铃壳物理参数对机采棉采摘力学特性的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(19): 30-37.
ZHANG Longchang, ZHANG Hongwen, WANG Lei, et al. Influence of different boll shell physical parameters on mechanical properties of machine-harvested cottons[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2020, 36(19): 30-37.
[11] HAMANN M T. Impact of cotton harvesting and storage methods on seed and fiber quality[D]. College Station: Texas A&M University, 2011:30.
[12] HUSIN N A B. Impact of seed cotton compression on cottonseed quality[D]. College Station: Texas A&M University, 2016:42.
[13] 孔繁荣, 周钦, 陈莉娜. 棉纤维集合体压缩后性能分析[J]. 上海纺织科技, 2018, 46(3): 7-10.
KONG Fanrong, ZHOU Qin, CHEN Lina. Performance analysis of cotton fiber assembly after compression[J]. Shanghai Textile Science & Technology, 2018, 46(3): 7-10.
[14] ANTHOY W S. The harvesting and ginning of cotton. In cotton: science and technology[M]. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2006: 76-202.
[15] PRIVAS E, GAWRYSIAK G, LAPEYRE M, et al. Influence of cotton variety on compression and destructuration abilities under elevated pressure[J]. Cellulose, 2013, 20: 1013-1022.
[16] 杜晓雪, 郭文斌, 王春光, 等. 饲用甜高粱秸秆应力松弛特性及参数优化的试验研究[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2019, 24(2): 123-131.
DU Xiaoxue, GUO Wenbin, WANG Chunguan, et al. Stress relaxation characteristics and parameters optimization of feed sweet sorghum[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2019, 24(2): 123-131.
[17] 马彦华, 宣传忠, 武佩, 等. 玉米秸秆振动压缩过程的应力松弛试验[J]. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(19): 88-94.
MA Yanhua, XUAN Chuanzhong, WU Pei, et al. Experiment on stress relaxation of corn stover during compression with assisted vibration[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2016, 32(19): 88-94.
[18] 王军, 张宏文, 王磊, 等. 机采籽棉压缩特性及可压缩性研究[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2022, 44(1): 212-221.
WANG Jun, ZHANG Hongwen, WANG Lei, et al. Study on compression characteristics and compressibility of machine-harvested seed cotton[J]. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis, 2022, 44(1): 212-221.
[19] 孔凡婷, 吴腾, 陈长林, 等. 籽棉压缩与应力松弛力学特性及模型构建[J]. 农业工程学报, 2021, 37(7): 53-60.
KONG Fanting, WU Teng, CHEN Changlin, et al. Mechanical properties and construction of constitutive model for compression and stress relaxation of seed cotton[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural, 2021, 37(7): 53-60.
[20] 王士国. 新疆兵团机采籽棉预处理清理工艺试验研究[D]. 咸阳: 西北农林科技大学, 2008:9-13.
WANG Shiguo. Experimental research on machine-harvested seed cotton pre-processing and cleaning flow in Xinjiang production and construction corps[D]. Xianyang: Northwest A&F University, 2008:9-13.
[21] 顾伟, 王巧华, 李庆旭, 等. 基于改进SSD的棉种破损检测[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2021, 40(3): 278-285.
GU Wei, WANG Qiaohua, LI Qingxu, et al. Improved SSD based detection of damaged cottonseed[J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University, 2021, 40(3): 278-285.
[22] 王冰, 张洪洲, 刘媛杰, 等. 棉籽品质识别系统设计[J]. 科技视界, 2018(31): 88-89, 126.
WANG Bing, ZHANG Hongzhou, LIU Yuanjie, et al. Design of cottonseed quality recognition system based on machine vision technology[J]. Science & Technology Vision, 2018(31): 88-89,126.
[23] 孙静鑫, 杨作梅, 郭玉明, 等. 谷子籽粒压缩力学性质及损伤裂纹形成机理[J]. 农业工程学报, 2017, 33(18): 306-314.
SUN Jingxin, YANG Zuomei, GUO Yuming, et al. Compression mechanical properties and crack formation law of millet grain[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering. 2017, 33(18): 306-314.
[24] 杨作梅, 孙静鑫, 郭玉明. 不同含水率对谷子籽粒压缩力学性质与摩擦特性的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31: 253-260.
YANG Zuomei, SUN Jingxin, GUO Yuming. Effect of moisture content on compression mechanical properties and frictional characteristics of millet grain[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2015, 31: 253-260.
[25] 刘向新, 周亚立, 闫向辉, 等. 棉花清理加工工艺的设计原理[J]. 中国棉花加工, 2005, 5: 20-21.
LIU Xiangxin, ZHOU Yali, YAN Xianghui, et al. Design principle of cotton cleaning process[J]. China Cotton Processing, 2005, 5:20-21.
[26] MIYATAKE F, IWABUCHI K, ABE Y, et al. Effect of high moisture content on temperature and microbial activity of composting dairy cattle manure[J]. Journal of Jsam, 2007, 69: 48-54.
[1] 向忠, 赵唯, 何仕伟, 王宇航, 钱淼. 双组分织物含水率的微波谐振腔法测量技术[J]. 纺织学报, 2024, 45(04): 221-228.
[2] 倪敬达. 给棉方式对高产梳棉机刺辊梳理效果的影响[J]. 纺织学报, 2022, 43(08): 7-11.
[3] 吴艳琴, 田景山, 张煦怡, 徐守振, 左文庆, 张旺锋, 勾玲, 张亚黎, 董恒义, 酒兴丽, 余永川, 赵湛. 清理加工工序对新疆机采棉品质的影响[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(11): 24-28.
[4] 陈小文, 吴伟, 钟毅, 徐红, 毛志平. 棉织物的活性染料低含水率焙蒸固色工艺[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(07): 115-122.
[5] 刘明雪, 赵倩, 王晓辉, 刘琼溪, 邵建中. 磁控溅射纳米膜与不同纺织基材的结合牢度[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(02): 135-141.
[6] 吕汉明, 王翔宇, 刘凤坤. 基于介电谱的醋酸酯水刺非织造布含水率估算[J]. 纺织学报, 2020, 41(06): 55-60.
[7] 何华玲 于志财 张健飞 宋国文. 含水率对消防服用多层织物系统热蓄积的影响[J]. 纺织学报, 2017, 38(08): 108-113.
[8] 王青 王贯超. FA322B并条机牵伸机构主牵伸区部分参数的优化设计[J]. 纺织学报, 2017, 38(08): 139-143.
[9] 张鑫卿 张健飞 房宽峻 舒大武 巩继贤 刘秀明. 应用活性蓝19的棉织物低含水率-湿蒸染色工艺[J]. 纺织学报, 2017, 38(02): 129-133.
[10] 田景山 王文敏 王聪 牛玉萍 罗宏海 勾玲 张亚黎 张旺锋. 机械采收方式对新疆棉品质的影响[J]. 纺织学报, 2016, 37(07): 13-17.
[11] 郭建波 王丽琴 韩明 付菲. 关中地区土壤含水率对丝织品老化的影响[J]. 纺织学报, 2013, 34(11): 66-0.
[12] 景军锋 孙乐 李鹏飞. 基于微波技术的织物含水率测量方法[J]. 纺织学报, 2012, 33(9): 61-65.
[13] 刘淑强, 戴晋明, 贾虎生, 刘旭光, 许并社. 纺长丝用聚乳酸切片的干燥工艺[J]. 纺织学报, 2012, 33(7): 19-23.
[14] 季英超;姜凤琴;赵玉萍. 纤维用大麻品种的优选[J]. 纺织学报, 2010, 31(12): 19-22.
[15] 李红燕. 单层织物湿态热防护性能测试与分析[J]. 纺织学报, 2009, 30(12): 95-98.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备14006648号　 京公网安备11010502044800号
版权所有 © 2021 《纺织学报》编辑部
地址： 北京市朝阳区延静里中街3号主楼6层《纺织学报》杂志社　邮政编码：100025　
电话：010-65017711,65917740　传真：010-65016539　Email:fangzhixuebao@vip.126.com
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发