纺织学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (01): 185-193.doi: 10.13475/j.fzxb.20221200101

• 服装工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

情绪在小生褶子设计要素和语义评价间的中介作用

韩燕娜1, 江翼成1, 郑霞1(), 杨子田2   

  1. 1.浙江大学 艺术与考古学院,浙江 杭州 310063
    2.东华大学 服装与艺术设计学院, 上海 200051
  • 收稿日期:2022-12-01 修回日期:2023-03-07 出版日期:2024-01-15 发布日期:2024-03-14
  • 通讯作者: 郑霞(1979—),女,副教授,博士。主要研究方向为文化遗产认知与传播。E-mail:zhengxia@zju.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:韩燕娜(1986—),女,博士生。主要研究方向为数字文化遗产。
  • 基金资助:
    浙江省哲学社会科学领军人才培育课题(引进人才支持)(21YJRC02-1YB);国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFB1402104);国家重点研发计划项目(2019YFC1521105);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(S20230301)

Mediating role of emotions between pleated costume elements and semantic evaluations

HAN Yanna1, JIANG Yicheng1, ZHENG Xia1(), YANG Zitian2   

  1. 1. School of Art and Archaeology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310063, China
    2. College of Fashion and Design, Donghua University, Shanghai 200051, China
  • Received:2022-12-01 Revised:2023-03-07 Published:2024-01-15 Online:2024-03-14

摘要:

为厘清戏曲服装设计要素与审美情绪、审美评价间的关系,以越剧小生褶子为研究对象,以Leder审美认知加工模型和情绪PAD(愉悦度、激活度、优势度)模型为理论基础,采用纯涤纶和纯丝绸面料2种材质、15种颜色(上五色、下五色、中间五色)、4种纹样(无纹样、边花、折枝、团花)进行组合设计,利用CLO3D软件制作出120款越剧小生褶子,以三维穿着图片作为刺激材料,在35名被试者情绪测量和5组语义评价的基础上,分析了不同设计元素对语义评价和PAD情绪的影响及其相互关系。研究结果表明:小生褶子设计要素能够引起不同的审美情绪和语义评价,根据情绪影响可将小生褶子颜色划分为3类:高愉悦、低唤醒、高支配颜色,高愉悦、高唤醒、低支配颜色和低愉悦、低唤醒、低支配颜色,在此基础上探明了情绪维度在褶子设计要素与语义评价间的中介作用。

关键词: 戏曲服装, 感性语义, PAD情绪模型, 褶子, 中介作用, 审美理论

Abstract:

Objective Chinese opera costumes play a vital role in the opera performance. To ensure the social preservation of traditional opera culture, it requires understanding how young audiences perceive and evaluate costumes emotionally and semantically. However, limited research has been done on the quantitative relationship among costume design elements, aesthetic emotions, and semantic evaluations. Therefore, using Leder's aesthetic cognitive processing model and the emotional Pleasure-Arousal-Dominance (PAD) model, this study investigated how emotions are involved in the semantic evaluations of clothing. The Xiaosheng pleated garment of Yue Opera served as the specific research object.

Method Using two types of materials, pure polyester and pure silk, with 15 colors (top five colors, bottom five colors, middle five colors) and 4 patterns (no pattern, flower decorated border, flower broken in branch, flower medallion) for combination design, 120 pictures were built by CLO3D 6.0. Through corpus search, group classification, and expert consultation, we screened five groups of semantic differential pairs used to describe the Xiaosheng pleated garments: low level-high level, refined-rough, fresh-gaudy, brave-gentle, and stiff-drape. University students were invited to randomly score all the samples on the liking, PAD emotions, and semantic evaluations on PsychoPy 2022.2.4, and data from 35 validated subjects was analyzed via SPSS 25 and Amos 26.

Results The relevance of pleated garment design elements, emotions, and semantic evaluations was first examined. The results showed that only the material had a significant correlation with the semantic "stiff-drape". The color was strongly correlated with liking, pleasure, dominance, arousal, "low level-high level", and "refined-rough". The pattern was also significantly correlated with the last three. Moreover, pleasure had a significant correlation with all semantics except for "fresh-gaudy", while arousal was significantly correlated with "fresh-gaudy" and "brave-gentle". Finally, dominance had a significant correlation with all semantics. We further leveraged one-way ANOVA to test the effects of design elements on emotions and semantics, respectively. Material did not affect emotions, and showed significance only in semantics "stiff-drape". The arousal of flower medallion was significantly higher than that of no pattern, and those with flower medallion were voted to be more high-class. Color had a significant effect on all emotions and semantics. According to the emotional impact, the color of Xiaosheng pleated clothes can be clustered into 3 categories: the first category is high pleasure, low arousal, high dominance colors, containing Aiqing, white, light pink, light blue, and black. The second category is high pleasure, high arousal, low dominance colors, containing bright red, goose yellow, pink, and bright yellow. The third category is low pleasure, low arousal, low dominance colors, containing treasure blue, lake, old green, medium green, and purple. Finally, the study constructed the mediating model of emotions on partial design elements and semantic evaluations. The analysis shows that arousal and dominance played a mediating role in clustered color type, pattern and "low level - high level". Pleasure, arousal, and dominance mediated the "refined-rough" in the clustered color and pattern. In the clustered color and semantic judgment of "fresh-gaudy", PAD played the mediation roles. "Brave-gentle" evaluation was mediated by the pleasure and arousal of the color. In addition, the dominance of color positively predicted the semantics "stiff-drape".

Conclusion The combinations of materials, colors and patterns of pleated garments have effects on both aesthetic judgments and aesthetic emotions. Pleated garments with the feeling of high-level, refined, drape, fresh, and gentle were more likely to be preferred by the youngsters, and the design of patterns was significantly associated with the semantics "low level-high level", "refined-rough", and emotional arousal. The study also found that color can significantly affect aesthetic emotions. Based on the PAD emotion model, the traditional opera costume color scheme was reclassified into three major categories: high pleasure, high arousal, and low dominance; high pleasure, low arousal, and high dominance; and low pleasure, low arousal, and low dominance. It was also explored that emotions played an important mediating role in the pleated garment design elements and semantic evaluations. Therefore, this study provides an empirical reference for the aesthetic process of opera costumes and their innovative design.

Key words: opera costumes, perceptual semantics, PAD emotional model, pleated garment, mediation model, aesthetic theory

中图分类号: 

  • TS941.12

表1

实验面料颜色参数"

类别 颜色 H S V 类别 颜色 H S V 类别 颜色 H S V


大红 351 90 86

淡粉 1 17 95

粉色 330 55 91
老绿 147 98 36 淡蓝 197 34 82 宝蓝 227 76 60
明黄 46 93 98 鹅黄 55 71 99 紫色 343 69 39
白色 0 0 100 艾青 152 28 89 湖色 191 100 63
黑色 0 0 0 中绿 159 76 80 香色 45 67 48

图1

实验纹样形态"

图2

部分试样示意图"

图3

实验流程图"

表3

褶子设计要素对情绪及语义的影响的单因素方差分析"

维度 组别 自由度 均方 F Sig
材质 低档的-高档的 1 0.682 0.708 0.402
精致的-粗犷的 1 2.055 2.637 0.107
挺括的-垂坠的 1 71.297 228.537** 0.000
清新的-浓艳的 1 0.479 0.199 0.656
勇武的-斯文的 1 3.161 1.493 0.224
愉悦度 1 0.114 0.143 0.706
唤醒度 1 0.182 0.323 0.571
支配度 1 0.395 0.266 0.607
纹样
装饰
低档的-高档的 3 4.915 5.725** 0.001
精致的-粗犷的 3 5.530 8.285** 0.000
挺括的-垂坠的 3 0.152 0.163 0.921
清新的-浓艳的 3 1.205 0.498 0.684
勇武的-斯文的 3 0.522 0.241 0.868
愉悦度 3 0.549 0.688 0.561
唤醒度 3 0.899 1.632 0.186
支配度 3 0.513 0.342 0.795
颜色 低档的-高档的 14 6.602 31.665** 0.000
精致的-粗犷的 14 4.921 20.565** 0.000
挺括的-垂坠的 14 1.977 2.581** 0.003
清新的-浓艳的 14 19.615 215.137** 0.000
勇武的-斯文的 14 17.230 153.732** 0.000
愉悦度 14 6.145 79.102** 0.000
唤醒度 14 4.146 50.843** 0.000
支配度 14 11.996 158.993** 0.000

表2

小生褶子设计要素与PAD情绪及语义评价的Spearman相关矩阵"

类型 均值 标准差 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1 材质 0.064 0.040 0.003 0.042 0.087 -0.136 0.811** -0.057 0.168
2 颜色 -0.319** -0.481** -0.360** -0.281** -0.350** 0.261** -0.154 0.177 -0.060
3 纹样 0.102 0.111 0.240** 0.109 0.342** -0.410** -0.071 0.166 -0.090
4 不喜欢-喜欢 3.271 1.236 0.396** -0.104 0.926** 0.886** -0.728** 0.392** -0.660** 0.482**
5 愉悦度 3.930 0.890 - 0.617** 0.382** 0.417** -0.512** 0.214* -0.119 0.317**
6 唤醒度 3.158 0.748 -0.125 0.048 -0.102 -0.025 0.475** -0.189*
7 支配度 3.031 1.216 0.864** -0.718** 0.381** -0.658** 0.486**
8 低档的-高档的 3.796 0.980 -0.739** 0.376** -0.457** 0.312**
9 精致的-粗犷的 3.160 0.889 -0.406** 0.561** -0.676**
10 挺括的-垂坠的 3.983 0.953 -0.384** 0.456**
11 清新的-浓艳的 3.844 1.545 -0.765**
12 勇武的-斯文的 3.960 1.458

图4

褶子设计要素对情绪和语义评价的影响"

图5

颜色对情绪影响的分布"

图6

引入中介变量前后的回归模型"

图7

情绪在设计要素与“低档的-高档的”间的中介作用 注:**表示0.01的显著水平;*表示0.05的显著水平。"

图8

情绪在设计要素与“精致的-粗犷的”间的中介作用"

图9

情绪在设计要素与“清新的-浓艳的”间的中介作用"

图10

情绪在设计要素与“勇武的-斯文的”间的中介作用"

图11

情绪在设计要素与“挺括的-垂坠的”间的中介作用"

[1] 王筱颖. 戏曲现代戏服装的美学特征:评《戏曲现代戏服装设计与体现》[J]. 上海纺织科技, 2022, 50(6):65-66.
WANG Xiaoying. Aesthetic characteristics of modern drama costumes in traditional opera: comment on “the design and embodiment of modern drama costumes in traditional opera”[J]. Shanghai Textile Science and Technology, 2022, 50 (6): 65-66.
[2] CHATTERJEE A. Prospects for a cognitive neuroscience of visual aesthetics[J]. Bulletin of Psychology and the Arts, 2003, 4(2): 55-60.
[3] LEDER H, BEKLE B, OEBEBST A. A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments[J]. British Journal of Psychology, 2004, 95(4): 489-508.
doi: 10.1348/0007126042369811
[4] LEDER H, NADAL M. Ten years of a model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments: the aesthetic episode:developments and challenges in empirical aesthetics[J]. British Journal of Psychology, 2014, 105(4): 443-464.
doi: 10.1111/bjop.2014.105.issue-4
[5] PEKARIK A J, DOERING Z D, KARNS D A. Exploring satisfying experiences in museums[J]. Curator: The Museum Journal, 1999, 42(2):152-173.
doi: 10.1111/cura.1999.42.issue-2
[6] 李倩文, 王建萍, 杨雅岚, 等. 基于意象尺度的男西装造型风格认知评价[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(4): 149-154.
LI Qianwen, WANG Jianping, YANG Yalan, et al. Cognitive evaluation of men's suit modeling style based on image scale[J] Journal of Textile Research, 2021, 42(4):149-154.
[7] 魏文达, 刘成霞. 扭曲视错服装图像的关注度与感性评价[J]. 服装学报, 2021, 6(6):555-561.
WEI Wenda, LIU Chengxia. Attention and Kansei evaluation of distorted visual illusion clothing images[J]. Journal of Clothing Research, 2021, 6(6):555-561.
[8] 孟祥波. 基于感性工学的满族服饰色彩意象评价模型研究[D]. 大庆: 东北石油大学, 2021:1-27.
MENG Xiangbo. Research on the evaluation model of Manchu clothing color image based on perceptual engineering[D]. Daqing: Northeast Petroleum University, 2021:1-27.
[9] 顾朝晖, 王亚娟. 明代青花纹样在旗袍上的应用效果[J]. 纺织学报, 2018, 39(1): 126-132.
GU Chaohui, WANG Yajuan. Application effect of blue and white patterns on cheongsam in the Ming dynasty[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2018, 39 (1): 126-132.
[10] 周小溪, 梁惠娥. 基于感性意象的服装面料设计效果评价[J]. 纺织学报, 2015, 36(4): 60-64.
ZHOU Xiaoxi, LIANG Hui'e. Evaluation of the effect of clothing fabric design based on perceptual images[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2015, 36 (4): 60-64.
[11] 吕佳, 陈东生. 基于消费者心理认知的服装情感评价[J]. 纺织学报, 2015, 36(9): 100-107.
LÜ Jia, CHEN Dongsheng. Clothing emotion evaluation based on consumer psychological cognition[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2015, 36 (9): 100-107.
[12] 陈弈菲, 刘驰, 杨萌. 基于响应曲面分析的连体泳装结构情绪测量[J]. 纺织学报, 2022, 43(10): 161-168.
CHEN Yifei, LIU Chi, YANG Meng. Research on emotion computing of bra structure based on emotion measurement[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2022, 43(10): 161-168.
[13] 徐冰. 基于情绪测量的服装图像情感计算研究[D]. 上海: 东华大学, 2018:39-42.
XU Bing. Research on emotion computing of clothing images based on emotion measurement[D]. Shanghai: Donghua University, 2018:39-42.
[14] PINILLA A, GARCIA J, RAFFE W, et al. Affective visualization in virtual reality: an integrative review[J]. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 2021. DOI:10.3389/frvir.2021.630731.
[15] MEHRABIAN A, RUSSELL J A. An approach to environmental psychology[M]. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1974: 1-50.
[16] 崔唯, 强凯, 王晓宇. 传统京剧戏衣"上下五色"穿戴规制形成与特点探析[J]. 中国艺术, 2020(3):10.
CUI Wei, QIANG Kai, WANG Xiaoyu. Analysis on the formation and characteristics of the "five colors" wearing regulation of traditional Peking Opera costumes[J]. Chinese Art, 2020 (3): 10.
[17] 韩燕娜. 越剧服饰设计[M]. 北京: 中国纺织出版社, 2022:3-10.
HAN Yanna. Shaoxing Opera costume design[M]. Beijing: China Textile & Apparel Press, 2022:3-10.
[18] PAULHUS D L, VAZIRE S. The self-report method[M]//ROBINS R W,FRALEY R C,KRUEGER R F. Handbook of Research Methods in Personality Psychology. [S.l.]: The Guilford Press, 2007: 224-239.
[19] FONTOURA P, MENU M. Visual perception of natural colors in painting: an eye-tracking study of Grünewald resurrection[J]. Color Research and Applications, 2021, 46(3): 582-594.
doi: 10.1002/col.v46.3
[20] BARON R M, KENNY D A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical consider-ations[J]. Chapman and Hall, 1986, 51(6):1173-1182.
[21] 温忠麟, 叶宝娟. 中介效应分析:方法和模型发展[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22(5):731-745.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2014.00731
WEN Zhonglin, YE Baojuan. Mediation effect analysis: methods and model development[J]. Progress in Psychological Science, 2014, 22 (5): 731-745.
[1] 蔡丽玲, 任钱斌, 季晓芬, 肖增瑞, 章依凌. 女性运动裤脚款式感知评价与个性化定制推荐[J]. 纺织学报, 2023, 44(04): 165-171.
[2] 陈弈菲, 刘驰, 杨萌. 基于响应曲面分析的连体泳装结构情绪测量[J]. 纺织学报, 2022, 43(10): 161-168.
[3] 赵馨, 王彩霞, 周小皮, 丁雪梅. 基于岭回归方法的羊毛衫洗后特征感性评价[J]. 纺织学报, 2022, 43(07): 155-161.
[4] 侯一鸣, 鲁成. 服装企业环保主张对消费者购买意愿的影响[J]. 纺织学报, 2022, 43(01): 201-207.
[5] 何琳, 陈李红, 丁雪梅. 基于跨理论模型的服装可持续消费行为研究[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(11): 143-150.
[6] 李倩文, 王建萍, 杨雅岚, 张冰洁, 李知霖. 基于数量化理论I的男西装款式要素感性评价[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(05): 155-161.
[7] 李倩文, 王建萍, 杨雅岚, 张冰洁, 李知霖, 王莉. 基于意象尺度的男西装造型风格认知评价[J]. 纺织学报, 2021, 42(04): 149-154.
[8] 邱丽俊, 陈李红. 基于熵值法的服装品牌形象价值创造指标定量化评价[J]. 纺织学报, 2020, 41(07): 160-166.
[9] 蔡建梅, 祝焕. 基于区块链技术的服装产品开发机制[J]. 纺织学报, 2019, 40(10): 183-190.
[10] 张苏道, 薛文良, 魏孟媛, 周黄鹂. 眼动仪在服装面料色彩视觉评价中的应用[J]. 纺织学报, 2019, 40(03): 139-145.
[11] 邢乐 梁惠娥 刘传兰. 中式服装消费意向的影响因素[J]. 纺织学报, 2017, 38(03): 155-161.
[12] 亓延;范雪荣;崔荣荣. 礼教文化视野下的近代齐鲁服饰文化变迁[J]. 纺织学报, 2010, 31(3): 104-110.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!