纺织学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (11): 121-127.doi: 10.13475/j.fzxb.20230506301

• 纺织工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

玻璃纤维复合材料损伤裂纹修复及其性能评价

余晓佩1, 沈伟1,2, 陈立峰1,2, 竺铝涛1,2,3()   

  1. 1.浙江理工大学 纺织科学与工程学院(国际丝绸学院), 浙江 杭州 310018
    2.浙江理工大学桐乡研究院有限公司, 浙江 嘉兴 314500
    3.绍兴宝旌复合材料有限公司, 浙江 绍兴 312000
  • 收稿日期:2023-05-25 修回日期:2024-08-05 出版日期:2024-11-15 发布日期:2024-12-30
  • 通讯作者: 竺铝涛(1983—),男,副教授,博士。研究方向为产业用纺织品和纺织结构复合材料。E-mail:zhult@zstu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:余晓佩(1998—),女,硕士生。主要研究方向为玻璃纤维复合材料性能。
  • 基金资助:
    浙江省基础公益研究计划项目(LGG21E050025);省“尖兵”研发攻关计划项目(2023C01097)

Damage crack repair and performance evaluation of glass fiber reinforced composites

YU Xiaopei1, SHEN Wei1,2, CHEN Lifeng1,2, ZHU Lütao1,2,3()   

  1. 1. College of Textile Science and Engineering (International Institute of Silk), Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310018, China
    2. Zhejiang Sci-Tech University Tongxiang Research Institute, Jiaxing, Zhejiang 314500, China
    3. Shaoxing Baojing Composite Material Co., Ltd., Shaoxing, Zhejiang 312000, China
  • Received:2023-05-25 Revised:2024-08-05 Published:2024-11-15 Online:2024-12-30

摘要: 玻璃纤维复合材料(GFRP)层合板在服役过程中易产生微裂纹,常规的处理方法很难有效地将树脂预涂液涂覆在损伤层合板表面并覆盖或润湿裂缝,因此制约了GFRP的使用领域。为解决上述问题,通过使用5种不同质量分数的树脂预涂液(RPC)对损伤后的层合板进行修复,并与不使用RPC的修复方法作对比,观察并测试了层合板在常温以及60 ℃下的修复效果,分析其力学性能。结果表明:树脂预涂液对材料的修复有着明显的效果,不同浓度的RPC以及不同的固化温度都会影响修复效果;质量分数为25%RPC的修复效果最好,试样在常温下固化7 d压缩性能恢复了17%,在60 ℃下压缩性能恢复了26%。

关键词: 玻璃纤维增强复合材料, 裂纹修复, 层间断裂, 树脂预涂液, 毛细作用

Abstract:

Objective Due to impact damage, fatigue, aging, and other factors, composite parts may inevitably experience damage. Interface cracking between the layers of glass fiber reinforced composites (GFRP) can significantly reduce mechanical properties, such as stiffness and compressive strength. To prevent resource wastage and economic loss caused by replacing damaged components, this research focuses on developing cost-effective and simple maintenance procedures for repairing defects.

Method We investigated a simple and convenient GFRP repair technique for the repair of sharp-edge delamination cracks. Pressure was not required, as the resin solution containing acetone penetrated the delamination crack through capillary action. The acetone solution effectively covered and wetted the micro-cracks in the composite laminates during service, allowing the resin to fill the cracks. The prepared resin pre-coating solution was applied to the damaged laminates, followed by the conventional repair solution. Over time, the resin filled the cracks, and the repair effect was evaluated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and mechanical property testing.

Results Glass fiber composite laminates were prepared using a hot-press pot forming process, and impact damage was induced by the drop hammer method. Five different mass fractions of pre-coat (RPC) solutions were used for the repair: 10% RPC, 20% RPC, 25% RPC, 35% RPC, and 45% RPC. The repair effects were compared with the method without RPC and evaluated at room temperature and 60 ℃. The curing effect of the repair solution was analyzed using Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). CT scanning revealed effective repair of the damaged parts, with filling and recombination of the layered damage under the action of resin. The results of FT-IR and DSC showed high conversion of epoxy groups and low curing temperature, indicating good curing performance of the repair liquid. Increasing the temperature was found to enhance the curing of the repair solution, with better repair effects observed at 60 ℃ compared to room temperature, as shown in Tables 2 and 3. The repair rates for the five RPC solutions with different mass fractions at room temperature were 8%, 10%, 17%, 13%, and 12%, respectively. It was found that normal temperature was not conducive to resin permeation, resulting in lower repair rates. At 60 ℃, the repair rates were 11%, 17%, 26%, 20%, and 16%, respectively, which were significantly higher than at room temperature. Among the different concentrations, 25% RPC demonstrated the best performance. After curing at room temperature for 7 days, the compressibility of the repaired specimens recovered by 17%, and this recovery was more pronounced at 60 ℃, reaching 26%. Compressive load-displacement curves were obtained for the specimens cured at 60 ℃ for seven days. After repair with a 25% RPC solution, the composite exhibited significant fluctuations in compressive load with displacement, reaching a maximum of 11 664.57 N, while the compressive load after repair with a 10% RPC solution was relatively low, possibly due to interlaminar fiber fracture. At the point of maximum load, the curve dropped abruptly, indicating complete damage of the specimen under compression. The strain energy was rapidly released, and the composite specimen was no longer subjected to compression load, resulting in a rapid drop in load.

Conclusion Using NPEL-128 epoxy as a component of the repair solution, combined with D230 curing agent, the repair solution demonstrated effective repair, with the resin showing resistance to hydrolysis and strong adhesion to the material. The six repair methods ranked as follows: 25% RPC > 35% RPC > 45% RPC > 20% RPC > 10% RPC > routine repair (without RPC).

Key words: glass fiber reinforced composite, crack repair, interlaminar fracture, resin pre-coating solution, capillary effect

中图分类号: 

  • TB332

图1

热压罐成型示意图"

图2

摆锤冲击法装置示意图"

图3

冲击后损伤试样图"

图4

NPEL-128环氧树脂的FT-IR光谱图"

图5

不同波数下的吸光度变化"

图6

不同特征峰值下环氧基团的固化反应转化率曲线"

图7

升温速率为10 ℃/min下的树脂DSC曲线"

表1

25 ℃不同修复方法下试样的压缩强度"

试样 固化
温度/℃
压缩强度/
MPa
标准差 修复率/%
原试样 398.4 20.007
损伤试样 295.4 23.860
常规修复 25 302.4 17.213 7
10% RPC 25 303.6 19.269 8
20%RPC 25 306.2 19.057 10
25%RPC 25 313.4 11.631 17
35%RPC 25 308.8 20.765 13
45%RPC 25 307.8 21.064 12

表2

60 ℃不同修复方法下试样的压缩强度"

试样 固化
温度/℃
压缩
强度/MPa
标准差 修复
率/%
原试样 398.4 20.007
损伤试样 295.4 23.860
常规修复试样 60 305 15.540 9
10%RPC修复试样 60 306.4 13.296 11
20%RPC修复试样 60 312.6 19.919 17
25%RPC修复试样 60 322.6 22.512 26
35%RPC修复试样 60 315.8 8.814 20
45%RPC修复试样 60 311.4 15.565 16

图8

60 ℃下不同试样的载荷-位移曲线"

图9

试样的CT扫描图"

[1] 李鹏, 杜艺博, 黄培炜, 等. 基于无壁型微脉管的光能损伤自修复复合材料[J]. 材料导报, 2022, 36(2): 204-208.
LI Peng, DU Yibo, HUANG Peiwei, et al. Self-repairing composite material of light energy damage based on microvessel without wall[J]. Materials Report, 2022, 36(2): 204-208.
[2] RAFIEE R. On the mechanical performance of glass-fibre-reinforced thermosetting-resin pipes: a review[J]. Composite Structures, 2016, 143: 151-164.
[3] KHAN M A, KUMAR A S, KUMARAN S T, et al. Effect of tool wear on machining GFRP and AISI D2 steel using alumina based ceramic cutting tools[J]. Silicon, 2019, 11(1): 153-158.
[4] SINGH J, KUMAR M, KUMAR S, et al. Properties of glass-fiber hybrid composites: a review[J]. Polymer-Plastics Technology and Engineering, 2017, 56(5): 455-469.
[5] SHARMA V, MEENA M L, KUMAR M. Mechanical properties of unfilled and particulate filled glass fiber reinforced polymer composites: a review[J]. Advances in Polymer Composite: Mechanics, Characterization and Applications, 2019, 2057(1):1-8.
[6] PRAJAPATI A R, DAVE H K, RAVAL H K. Impact energy absorption and fracture mechanism of FFF made fiberglass reinforced polymer composites[J]. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 2023, 29: 275-287.
[7] WANG HAIJIN, SUN JIE, LI Jianfeng, et al. Investigation on delamination morphology during drilling composite laminates[J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2014, 74: 257-266.
[8] SAEEDIFAR M, NAJAFABADI M A, ZAROUCHAS D, et al. Barely visible impact damage assessment in laminated composites using acoustic emission[J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2018, 152: 180-192.
[9] HAUTIER M, LÉVÊQUE D, HUCHETTE C, et al. Investigation of composite repair method by liquid resin infiltration[J]. Plastics, Rubber and Composites, 2010, 39(3-5): 200-207.
[10] KIM H J, KIM H S, LEE G Y, et al. Three-dimensional carbon fiber composite printer for CFRP repair[J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2019, 174: 1-8.
[11] THUNGA M, AKINC M, KESSLER M R. Tailoring the toughness and CTE of high temperature bisphenol E cyanate ester (BECy) resin[J]. Express Polymer Letters, 2014, 8(5): 336-344.
[12] LAI W L, SAEEDIPOUR H, GOH K L. Mechanical properties of low-velocity impact damaged carbon fibre reinforced polymer laminates: effects of drilling holes for resin-injection repair[J]. Composite Structures, 2020, 235: 1-7.
[13] BAUER A E. Injection repair of advanced aircraft composites with a high temperature cyanate ester resin[D]. Ames: Iowa State University, 2013: 4-12.
[14] SHIN J H, CHOE H S, LEE J S, et al. Injection repair of CFRP using a multi-wall carbon nanotubes-modified epoxy resin: flexural and compression behavior[J]. Journal of Composite Materials, 2022, 56(28): 4231-4244.
[15] THUNGA M, BAUER A, OBUSEK K, et al. Injection repair of carbon fiber/bismaleimide composite panels with bisphenol E cyanate ester resin[J]. Composites Science and Technology, 2014, 100: 174-181.
[16] JI Y, YUAN B, HU X, et al. Repairing sharp delamination cracks in CFRP through capillary action of acetone-diluted resin solution[J]. Composites Science and Technology, 2022, 219: 1-8.
[17] WANG B, HU X, LU P. Improvement of adhesive bonding of grit-blasted steel substrates by using diluted resin as a primer[J]. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 2017, 73: 92-99.
[18] HAN X, YUAN B, TAN B, et al. Repair of subsurface micro-cracks in rock using resin pre-coating technique[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2019, 196: 485-491.
[1] 陈露, 吴孟锦, 贾立霞, 阎若思. 氧等离子体改性超高分子量聚乙烯纤维复合材料层间损伤声发射特征分析[J]. 纺织学报, 2023, 44(07): 116-125.
[2] 焦亚男;李晓久;董孚允. 三维缝合复合材料性能研究[J]. 纺织学报, 2002, 23(02): 16-18.
Viewed
Full text
10
HTML PDF
Just accepted Online first Issue Just accepted Online first Issue
0 0 2 0 0 8

  From Others local
  Times 3 7
  Rate 30% 70%

Abstract
77
Just accepted Online first Issue
0 0 77
  From Others local
  Times 63 14
  Rate 82% 18%

Cited

Web of Science  Crossref   ScienceDirect  Search for Citations in Google Scholar >>
 
This page requires you have already subscribed to WoS.
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!