Journal of Textile Research ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (05): 93-101.doi: 10.13475/j.fzxb.20220100501

• Textile Engineering • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Quantitative analysis method of cotton yarn defects based on heterogeneous ensemble learning

YANG Yun(), SUN Tong, LIANG Zhenyu, PENG Guang, BAO Jinsong   

  1. College of Mechanical Engineering, Donghua University, Shanghai 201620, China
  • Received:2022-01-04 Revised:2022-04-17 Online:2023-05-15 Published:2023-06-09

Abstract:

Objective Yarn defects are an important index to evaluate yarn quality, and it is necessary to classify the common yarn defects such as coarse yarn segment, thin yarn segment and neps in a more detailed way to achieve multilevel management of yarn quality. The key to yarn defect grading is how to quantitatively analyze the appearance geometric dimensions such as yarn defect length and diameter. Aiming at the problems of low accuracy and poor reliability of the current quantitative analysis methods for cotton yarn defects, a quantitative analysis method for cotton yarn defects based on heterogeneous integrated learning is proposed.

Methods A two-dimensional dynamic simulation model for yarn defect detection based on capacitance sensor was established to analyze the influence law of yarn defect size on its signal. Following that, the time domain analysis method was adopted to extract the time domain parameters of yarn defect signals as the quantitative analysis characteristics for yarn defects. Then, the support vector regression algorithm, radial basis function neural network algorithm and gradient boosting decision tree were used as primary and meta learners 'respectively' to establish a heterogeneous integrated learning algorithm model for quantitative analysis of yarn defects, which was verified by experiments finally.

Results Based on the capacitive sensor, the dynamic simulation modeling and analysis of yarn defect detection was carried out, and the comprehensive capacitive sensor detection circuit principle and dynamic simulation analysis results showed that the yarn defect length and yarn defect diameter were the key factors affecting the yarn defect signal change, among which the peak change of the yarn defect signal was affected by the superposition coupling of the yarn defect diameter and the yarn defect length, and the duration of the yarn defect signal peak was only affected by the yarn defect length. The results collected by the time domain analysis method showed that the time domain feature parameters of different levels of yarn defects deminstrated obvious differences, proving that the time domain feature parameters could be adopted to estimate the appearance geometry of yarn defects. However, the relationship between the time domain feature parameters and the appearance geometry of the yarn blemishes remained vague and nonlinear. Therefore, a network with strong nonlinear approximation capability was required to map the time domain parameters and the appearance geometry of yarn defects, namely the quantitative analysis algorithm of yarn defects based on heterogeneous integration learning. The root mean square error and mean absolute error of the yarn defect diameter test set were 0.002 1 and 0.001 2, and the root mean square error and mean absolute error of the yarn defect length test set were 0.002 6 and 0.001 4, which represents a greater improvement than other types of single-model algorithms, and the goodness of fit was close to 1.00, which fully demonstrates that the algorithm proposed in this paper has a better fitting effect on the yarn defect diameter and yarn defect length, and the model has stronger reliability.

Conclusion A quantitative analysis method of yarn defects based on heterogeneous ensemble learning is proposed. The method picked the yarn defects signal by capacitive sensor, combined the time domain characteristic parameter extraction algorithm and multi-model heterogeneous ensemble algorithm, and conducted quantitative analysis of non-stationary and nonlinear yarn defects signal. The experimental results confirmed that the yarn defect quantitative analysis model based on integration of heterogeneous learning can improve the appearance of yarn defects quantitative accuracy of geometry size with the method of optimal fitting R2 close to 1.00. Compared with the conventional single model algorithm, the accuracy is improved by 10%, indicating the new method has good generalization ability and stability. It provides a more effective quantitative analysis scheme for yarn defects detection system based on electrical signal.

Key words: cotton yarn, yarn defect, quantitative analysis of yarn defect, yarn defect signal, yarn quality, heterogeneous ensemble learning algorithm

CLC Number: 

  • TS111.9

Fig.1

Dynamic simulation model of yarn defect detection based on capacitance sensor"

Fig.2

Results of dynamic simulation analysis of yarn defects"

Fig.3

Influence of yarn defect diameter (a)and length (b) on charge quantity."

Fig.4

Schematic diagram of transformer AC detection circuit"

Fig.5

Defective signal of short slub"

Fig.6

Defective signal of long slub"

Tab.1

Time domain characteristic parameters of yarn defects"

纱疵级别 长度/mm 直径/mm Xmax Xrms Xmin Lt S2 X ˉ
A2 8 0.569 1.28 0.23 -0.26 22 0.05 0.06
A3 8 0.602 1.48 0.28 -0.22 25 0.08 0.10
B2 12 0.593 1.34 0.26 -0.28 35 0.09 0.12
C3 20 0.647 1.60 0.35 -0.32 50 0.12 0.00
F 120 0.296 0.64 0.18 -0.18 145 0.03 0.05
H1 115 0.136 0.08 0.09 -0.31 138 0.01 -0.06

Fig.7

Geometric quantitative analysis algorithm model of yarn defects based on stack learning"

Fig.8

Framework for quantitative analysis of yarn defects"

Fig.9

Yarn defect signal acquisition platform"

Fig.10

Yarn signal segmentation. (a) Original signal; (b)Normal; (c)Long slub; (d)Nep; (e)Snicks; (f)Short slub"

Tab.2

Time domain characteristic parameters of quantitative analysis for yarn defects geometric dimensions"

组编号 纱疵类型 长度/mm 直径/mm Xmax Xrms Xmin Lt S2 X ˉ
1 棉结 8 0.569 1.28 0.23 -0.26 22 0.05 0.06
2 棉结 8 0.602 1.48 0.28 -0.22 25 0.08 0.1
3 短粗节 12 0.593 1.34 0.26 -0.28 35 0.09 0.12
200 短粗节 20 0.647 1.60 0.35 -0.32 50 0.12 0.00
201 短粗节 46 0.403 0.88 0.26 -0.40 90 0.07 0.01
599 长粗节 120 0.296 0.64 0.18 -0.18 145 0.03 0.05
600 长细节 115 0.136 0.08 0.09 -0.31 138 0.01 -0.06

Fig.11

Learning curves of geometric dimension quantitative analysis algorithm for yarn defects"

Fig.12

Analysis of model regression fitting effect. (a)Regression fitting effect of yarn defect diameter;(b)Yarn defect length regression fitting effect"

Tab.3

Comparison of regression performance of different models"

模型 纱疵几何尺寸 R2 Xmae Xrmse 时间/s
本文方法 D 0.993 0.001 2 0.002 1 0.199 4
Ly 0.989 0.001 4 0.002 6 0.199 4
GBDT D 0.962 0.001 2 0.058 6 0.249 7
Ly 0.945 0.010 2 0.055 6 0.235 9
KNN D 0.924 0.009 6 0.041 5 0.009 9
Ly 0.902 0.068 9 0.379 6 0.009 8
XGBoost D 0.963 0.045 8 0.068 8 0.154 2
Ly 0.925 0.064 5 0.043 2 0.162 3
RBF D 0.936 0.005 2 0.078 9 0.101 9
Ly 0.922 0.052 3 0.081 2 0.102 3
SVR D 0.936 0.005 7 0.064 5 0.149 8
Ly 0.925 0.049 5 0.078 6 0.148 6
[1] 王充, 赵帆. 纱线疵点产生原因分析[J]. 棉纺织技术, 2016, 44(10):56-58.
WANG Chong, ZHAO Fan. Analysis on the cause of yarn defect[J]. Cotton Textile Technology, 2016, 44(10): 56-58.
[2] 玉红. 电子清纱器与成纱质量[J]. 黑龙江纺织, 2005(4):23-25.
YU Hong. Electronic yarn cleaner and yarn quality[J]. Heilongjiang Textile, 2005 (4):23-25.
[3] 黄小强. 一种智能清纱算法的研究与实现[D]. 杭州: 杭州电子科技大学, 2011:17-23.
HUANG Xiaoqiang. Research and implementation of an intelligent yarn clearing algorithm[D]. Hangzhou: Hangzhou Dianzi University, 2011: 17-23.
[4] PINTO J G, CARVALHO V, MONTEIRO J L, et al. Yarn-mass measurement with 1-mm-length samples[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2007, 54(2): 1177-1183.
doi: 10.1109/TIE.2007.893051
[5] 盛国俊, 董永贵. 纱线质量光电信号的消噪处理和异常检测[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 50(2): 229-231.
SHENG Guojun, DONG Yonggui. Yarn quality photoelectric signal denoising and abnormal detec-tion[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science & Technology), 2010, 50 (2):229-231.
[6] 李变变, 李忠健, 潘如如, 等. 纱线条干均匀性序列图像测量方法[J]. 纺织学报, 2016, 37(11):26-31.
LI Bianbian, LI Zhongjian, PAN Ruru, et al. Measurement of yarn evenness using sequence images[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2016, 37 (11):26-31.
[7] KANDROODI M R, ARAABI B N, BASSIRI M M, et al. Estimation of depth and length of defects from magnetic flux leakage measurements:verification with simulations, experiments, and pigging data[J]. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2017, 53(3):1-10.
[8] GE Yu, LIU Jinhai, ZHANG Huaguang, et al. An iterative stacking method for pipeline defect inversion with complex MFL signals[J]. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2020, 69(6):3780-3788.
doi: 10.1109/TIM.19
[9] WANG Zhenwei, FEI Yuan, YE Pengxin, et al. Crack characterization in ferromagnetic steels by pulsed eddy current technique based on GA-BP neural network model[J]. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 2020:2-8.
[10] WOLPERT D H. Stacked generalization[J]. Neural Networks, 1992, 5(2): 241-259.
doi: 10.1016/S0893-6080(05)80023-1
[11] ALVES A. Stacking machine learning classifiers to identify higgs bosons at the LHC[J]. Journal of Instrumentation, 2017, 12(5):1-3.
[12] YANG Jiangji, LI Jiangqiang, SHEN Ruifang, et al. Exploiting ensemble learning for automatic cataract detection and grading[J]. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 2016, 124: 45-57.
doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2015.10.007 pmid: 26563686
[13] 王佶宣, 邓斌, 王江. 基于经验模态分解与RBF神经网络的短期风功率预测[J]. 电力系统及其自动化学报, 2020, 32(11):109-115.
WANG Jixuan, DENG Bin, WANG Jiang. Short-term wind power prediction based on empirical mode decomposition and RBF neural network[J]. Power Systems and Automation, 2020, 32 (11):109-115.
[14] 周立俊, 黄腾, 王思捷, 等. 基于GA-SVR的地铁隧道沉降预测[J]. 地理空间信息, 2021, 19(3):115-117.
ZHOU Lijun, HUANG Teng, WANG Sijie, et al. Subway tunnel settlement prediction based on GA-SVR[J]. Geospatial Information, 2021, 19(3):115-117.
[15] KE G L, MENG Q, FINLEY T, et al. Lightgbm: a highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree[J]. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2017, 30(2): 3146-3154.
[16] FRIEDMAN J. Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine[J]. Annals of Statistics, 2001, 29(5):1189-1232.
doi: 10.1214/aos/1013203450
[17] 孙通, 杨芸, 杨耀, 等. 基于时频特征学习的分步式纱疵检测方法[J]. 东华大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 48(5):25-34.
SUN Tong, YANG Yun, YANG Yao, et al. Step-by-step yarn defect detection method based on time-frequency feature learning[J]. Journal of Donghua University(Natural Science), 2022, 48(5):25-34.
[1] WANG Yaqian, WAN Ailan, ZENG Deng. Preparation and performance evaluation of weft knitted ironing-free shirt fabric based on cotton/shape memory spandex [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2023, 44(05): 125-131.
[2] ZHANG Qingqing, NI Yuan, WANG Jun, ZHANG Yuze, JIANG Hui. Process design of spinning device based on runner fiber accumulation [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2023, 44(02): 83-89.
[3] SHAO Jingfeng, DONG Mengyuan. Influence of performance degradation of spinning frames on yarn quality under dependent competition failure [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2022, 43(06): 171-179.
[4] SHAO Jingfeng, SHI Xiaomin. Multi-objective optimization of spinning process parameters based on nondominated sorting genetic algorithm II [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2022, 43(01): 80-88.
[5] WU Jiaqing, WANG Ying, HAO Xinmin, GONG Yumei, GUO Yafei. Effect of filament feeding positions on structure and properties of siro-spinning core-spun yarns [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2021, 42(08): 64-70.
[6] GUO Minghua, LIU Xinjin. Investigation on distribution of fiber accelerated points in drafting zone of ring spinner based on cut-weighing method [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2021, 42(08): 71-75.
[7] ZUO Yajun, CAI Yun, WANG Lei, GAO Weidong. Influence of ply number of cotton yarns on fabrics performance [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2021, 42(04): 74-79.
[8] LI Dongjie, GUO Shuai, YANG Liu. Yarn defect detection based on improved image threshold segmentation algorithm [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2021, 42(03): 82-88.
[9] LI Ruiqing, WANG Wei, WEI Bingju, ZHOU Changwen, ZHANG Shutao. Sulfur black dyeing process with environment friendly reducing agent [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2020, 41(08): 50-54.
[10] DING Yongsheng, DAI Yamin, ZHONG Yi, XU Hong, MAO Zhiping, ZHANG Linping, CHEN Zhize. Dyeing kinetics of reactive dye on cotton yarn in Pickering emulsion system [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2020, 41(07): 101-108.
[11] ZHANG Huanhuan, ZHAO Yan, JING Junfeng, LI Pengfei. Yarn evenness measurement based on sub-pixel edge detection [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2020, 41(05): 45-49.
[12] LIN Huiting, AKANKWASA Nicholus Tayari, ZHANG Yuze, SHI Qianqian, WANG Jun. Effect of bypass channel on rotor-spun yarn properties in rotor spinning [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2019, 40(02): 153-158.
[13] ZHA Liugen, XIE Chunping. Prediction of cotton yarn quality based on four-layer BP neural network [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2019, 40(01): 52-56.
[14] . Microwave assisted preparation and sizing properties of carboxymethyl corn starch [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2018, 39(12): 59-66.
[15] . Application and process optimization of false twist in ring spinning machine [J]. JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH, 2018, 39(07): 27-31.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!