JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH ›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (4): 5-0.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Theoretical recognition accuracy and error rate for cashmere based on scale pattern gene code

  

  • Received:2013-05-09 Revised:2013-12-10 Online:2014-04-15 Published:2014-04-14

Abstract: For the identification for cashmere and fine wool based scale pattern gene codes, the accuracy was studied. These researches show that though the same gene codes of cashmere and fine wool follow the same distribution, the numerical characteristics are different. The numerical characteristics of gene codes show that the scale of cashmere is more like a square or narrow rectangle and that of fine wool more like a wide rectangle. Among scale pattern gene codes, the distribution curves of scale area, perimeter and rectangle factor between two types of fiber are serious overlap, which imply that the three gene codes can’t be used to distinguish cashmere from fine wool. Except for that, the distribution curves of other scale pattern gene codes are partial overlap. So the different identification standard can be developed on the basis of minimum recognition errors for each scale pattern gene code and the maximum recognition probability of 88.8% for cashmere and 92% for fine wool can be got. These results provide a theoretical basis for the finding of optimal gene group for distinguish cashmere from fine wool.

Key words: cashmere, fine wool, scale pattern gene code, numerical characteristic, distribution

CLC Number: 

  • TS102.3
[1] . Research progress on sweating rate distribution of human body [J]. JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH, 2018, 39(08): 179-184.
[2] . In fluence of sleeveless fitted cheongsam waist dart distribution on apparel modeling [J]. JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH, 2018, 39(08): 105-109.
[3] . Analysis on blending effect of colored fiber in digital rotor spun yarn [J]. JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH, 2018, 39(07): 32-38.
[4] . Spinning of low-ratio cashmere blends under slipping draft [J]. JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH, 2018, 39(06): 24-28.
[5] . Influencing actors and weight distribution of brand garments showcase display image [J]. JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH, 2018, 39(06): 162-166.
[6] . Test and study of pressure comfort threshold of female's garment [J]. JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH, 2018, 39(03): 132-136.
[7] . Prediction of pore sizes of polyester/polyamide 6 hollow segmented-pie microfiber nonwovens [J]. JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH, 2018, 39(01): 56-61.
[8] . Iedntification of cashmere and wool based on convolutional neuron networks and deep learning theory [J]. JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH, 2017, 38(12): 150-156.
[9] . Pattern prediction of flat-knitted fabric with section dyed yarn [J]. JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH, 2017, 38(10): 44-48.
[10] . Level set of central axis method of cashmere and wool diameter [J]. JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH, 2017, 38(09): 14-18.
[11] . Influence of filament distribution pattern on properties of composite yarns [J]. JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH, 2017, 38(09): 32-39.
[12] . Rapid identification method of cashmere and wool based on bag-of-visual-word [J]. JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH, 2017, 38(07): 130-134.
[13] . Structural characterizations of carbon fiber needled felts based on mixed Weibull distribution [J]. JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH, 2017, 38(06): 52-57.
[14] . Simulation on combing processing and prediction of combing web quality based on fiber length distribution by number [J]. JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH, 2017, 38(06): 23-27.
[15] . Method for calculating fiber length distribution based on hierarchical model of random-beard [J]. JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH, 2017, 38(02): 81-89.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!