Journal of Textile Research ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (07): 47-54.doi: 10.13475/j.fzxb.20230100101

• Textile Engineering • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Structure and moisture/thermal management evaluation of concave-convex lattice knitted fabrics

GE Meitong, DONG Zhijia(), CONG Honglian, DING Yuqin   

  1. Engineering Research Center for Knitting Technology, Ministry of Education, Jiangnan University,Wuxi, Jiangsu 214122, China
  • Received:2023-01-03 Revised:2023-04-03 Online:2024-07-15 Published:2024-07-15
  • Contact: DONG Zhijia E-mail:dongzj0921@163.com

Abstract:

Objective At present, light exercise is important for people's health. However, the conventional cooling and heating system has consumed significant amounts of energy to ensure optimal human body temperature during the light exercise. Sweat evaporation is an effective method for heat dissipation to maintain human thermal balance. The conventional textiles such as cotton fabric inevitably retain excessive sweat at the interface due to the intrinsic hydrophilicity, leading to wet and cool feeling. Therefore, fabrics with moisture and heat management capability is expected to transport liquid directionally, maintaining the skin dryness and finally achieving energy conservation and wearing comfort.

Method When a density difference exists on both sides of a single fabric, additional pressure difference will be generated to make water transfer spontaneously, according to the principle of differential capillary effect. Based on this principle, two polyester yarns (55.5 dtex(24 f) and 93.3 dtex(384 f)) were selected. Four concave-convex lattice fabrics were created with variations in structure, number, and distribution of connecting points, denoted as process A, B, C and D. In process A and B, the 55.5 dtex(24 f) polyester yarn was replaced by the 33.3 dtex(12 f) polyester yarn at the connecting coil to form obvious mesh, named as A2 and B4, respectively. In order to explore the influence of different coil structures on the moisture and heat management performance of fabric, 6 different fabrics A1, A2, B3, B4, C5 and D6 with the capability of moisture and heat management were prepared.

Results Fabrics in process A are configured with looping connecting coil and single tuck connecting coil, while process B incorporates three types of connecting coils: looping, single tuck, and double tuck coils. In contrast, process C only utilizes single tuck as the connecting coil, and process D incorporates looping connecting coil. Following the addition of 33.3 dtex(12 f) polyester yarn, fabrics A2 and B4 exhibited a noticeable mesh formation compared to A1 and B3. In order to assess the performance of the fabrics, various tests were conducted, including evaluation of moisture permeability, moisture management, droplet spreading, evaporation rate, and insulation rate. Analysis of the moisture permeability data revealed that fabric A1 outperformed the others. The presence of tuck connecting coils in processes B and C, spanning multiple horizontal rows, led to moisture condensation on the yarn/fiber and subsequent decrease in moisture permeability. Notably, the air permeability was primarily influenced by the fabric structure, with the introduction of 33.3 dtex(12 f) polyester yarn enhancing air permeability due to the formation of mesh. The weight of the fabrics demonstrated a positive correlation with unidirectional moisture transport capability. Thicker fabric D6 facilitated moisture transport, while the liquid easily penetrated soft fabrics. Fabric C5, featuring single tuck connection coil, displayed good unidirectional moisture transport and a large area change of droplet spreading due to the formation of transport channels. The relationship between evaporation and thermal insulation indicated a negative correlation, as faster liquid evaporation led to increased heat dissipation and decreased thermal insulation rate. The fabrics with a high proportion of microfibers, exhibited slow evaporation due to water absorption. Additionally, the mesh structure, provided improved evaporation efficiency. Overall, the connecting coils and fabric structure coordinately influenced the performance of fabric. As demonstrated by the correlation degree rankings, the comprehensive evaluation of the designed fabrics through grey relational analysis revealed that the tuck connection points in the process structure significantly influenced the fabric's heat and humidity management capabilities.

Conclusion Overall, the experiments show that the inner side of garment woven with 55.5 dtex(24 f) polyester yarn and the outer side knitted with 93.3 dtex(384 f) microfiber polyester achieved excellent unidirectional water transfer ab ability. It has been identified that the materials and structure jointly affected the comprehensive performance. The involvement of hydrophilic microfibre was found to reduce the moisture permeability and water evaporation rate. The connection coil of tuck was beneficial to unidirectional moisture transport but adverse to permeability. To the contrary, the structure of mesh was conducive to air permeability but poor in unidirectional water transport capability. In the final comprehensive evaluation, it demonstrated that single performance can not determine the overall moisture and heat management ability of the fabrics. The six fabrics used in this research are easy to produce without physical and chemical modification, which provides theoretical and experimental basis for the development of light sportswear fabrics with good moisture and heat management ability, environmental protection and durability.

Key words: one-way water transport, double jersey, thermal and moisture comfort, polyester microfiber, grey relational analysis

CLC Number: 

  • TS186.1

Fig.1

Fabric design principle"

Fig.2

Diagram of fabric front (a) and back (b) and concave-convex lattice structure (c)"

Fig.3

Schematic diagram of front and side of fabric structure.(a) Structure 1; (b) Structure 2; (c) Structure 3; (d) Structure 4"

Fig.4

Fabric connection point distribution. (a)Process 1; (b)Process 2; (c)Process 3; (d)Process 4"

Tab.1

Proportion of fabric structures %"

工艺
编号
双面无连接
(结构1)
成圈连接点
(结构2)
单集圈连接点
(结构3)
双集圈连接点
(结构4)
工艺1 87.50 6.25 6.25 0
工艺2 87.52 4.16 4.16 4.16
工艺3 93.75 0 6.25 0
工艺4 91.67 8.33 0 0

Tab.2

Fabric basic parameters"

工艺 试样
编号
厚度/
mm
面密度/
(g·m-2)
纱线比例/%
坯布 成品 Y1 Y2 Y3
工艺1 A1 0.652 86 117 45.95 54.05 0
A2 0.558 78 102 23.10 61.50 15.4
工艺2 B3 0.580 90 116 43.75 56.25 0
B4 0.570 81 113 30.30 60.10 9.6
工艺3 C5 0.564 94 118 39.20 60.80 0
工艺4 D6 0.788 132 190 45.60 54.40 0

Fig.5

Moisture permeability of fabric"

Fig.6

Air permeability of fabric"

Fig.7

Unidirectional moisture transfer index and area density of fabric"

Tab.3

Dripping diffusion area of fabric"

试样
编号
不同时间下深色区域面积/cm2
5 s 25 s 45 s
A2 4.40 4.43 4.31
C5 5.19 4.99 4.30
D6 3.25 3.00 2.87

Fig.8

Evaporation rate and insulation rate of fabric"

Tab.4

New data without dimensionalization"

类别 k=1 k=2 k=3 k=4 k=5
X'0 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
X'1 0.446 1.000 0.941 0.688 0.846
X'2 0.376 0.886 1.000 0.667 0.829
X'3 0.435 0.828 0.757 0.943 0.924
X'4 0.445 0.905 0.867 0.764 0.809
X'5 0.635 0.906 0.875 1.000 1.000
X'6 1.000 0.798 0.304 0.453 0.832

Tab.5

Equal weight correlation degree and weighted correlation degree"

试样
编号
等权
关联度
等权关联度
秩位
加权
关联度
加权关联度
秩位
A1 0.692 2 0.653 3
A2 0.660 4 0.624 5
B3 0.664 3 0.661 2
B4 0.627 5 0.603 6
C5 0.802 1 0.800 1
D6 0.606 6 0.641 4
[1] 郝习波, 李辉芹, 巩继贤, 等. 单向导湿功能纺织品的研究进展[J]. 纺织学报, 2015, 36(7):157-161,168.
HAO Xibo, LI Huiqin, GONG Jixian, et al. Review on unidirectional water transport functional fabrics[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2015, 36(7):157-161,168.
[2] MIAO D Y, WANG X F, YU J Y, et al. A biomimetic transpiration textile for highly efficient personal drying and cooling[J]. Advanced Functional Materials, 2021.DOI:10.1002/adfm.202008705.
[3] 王雪, 李娜娜, 徐密, 等. 导湿凉感织物结构设计与性能测试[J]. 针织工业, 2021(1):16-20.
WANG Xue, LI Nana, XU Mi, et al. Structural design and performance analysis of moisture transfer cool fabric[J]. Knitting Industries, 2021(1):16-20.
[4] LI X, JAVED M, GUO Y, et al. Superabsorbent fabric based on weft back weave structure for efficient evaporative cooling[J]. Adv Mater Inter, 2021. DOI:10.1002/admi.202001329.
[5] 侯秋平, 顾肇文, 王其. 灯芯点结构导湿快干针织物的设计[J]. 上海纺织科技, 2006, 34(7):54-55.
HOU Qiuping, GU Zhaowen, WANG Qi. Design of lampwick structure knitted fabric of good wet permeability and fast dry[J]. Shanghai Textile Science & Technology, 2006, 34(7):54-55.
[6] 钱娟, 谢婷, 张佩华, 等. 聚乙烯针织物的热湿舒适性能[J]. 纺织学报, 2022, 43(7):60-66.
QIAN Juan, XIE Ting, ZHANG Peihua, et al. Thermal and moisture comfort performance of polyethylene knitted fabric[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2022, 43(7):60-66.
[7] 范菲, 齐宏进. 织物孔径特性与织物结构及芯吸性能的关系[J]. 纺织学报, 2007, 28(7):38-41.
FAN Fei, QI Hongjin. Relationship between capillary properties and configurations and wicking capability of fabric[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2007, 28(7):38-41.
[8] 姚穆, 施楣梧, 蒋素婵. 织物湿传导理论与实际的研究第一报:织物的湿传导过程与结构的研究[J]. 西北纺织工学院学报, 2001, 15(2):1-8.
YAO Mu, SHI Meiwu, JIANG Suchan. The research on the theory and practice of wet permeability of fabrics (Ⅰ): research on the wet permeability process and fabric structure[J]. Journal of Northwest Textile Institute of Technology, 2001, 15(2):1-8.
[9] 张清山. 关于织物透气性与透湿性测试的几点启发[J]. 中国纤检, 2013(8):81-83.
ZHANG Qingshan. Some enlightenment from the tests of air permeability and moisture permeability for fabrics[J]. China Fiber Inspection, 2013(8):81-83.
[10] 潘菊芳, 廉志军, 井连英, 等. 纤维组合及组织结构对织物吸湿速干性能影响[J]. 棉纺织技术, 2004, 32(11):5-8.
PAN Jufang, LIAN Zhijun, JING Lianying, et al. Influence of fibre combination & stitch structure on fabric moisture absorbent & quick drying property[J]. Cotton Textile Technology, 2004, 32(11):5-8.
[11] 张辉, 徐军, 张建春, 等. 织物静态热湿舒适性测试分析[J]. 纺织学报, 2004, 25(4):56-58.
ZHANG Hui, XU Jun, ZHANG Jianchun, et al. Test & analyze the heat-moisture comfortable property of fabric[J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2004, 25(4):56-58.
[12] 李慧, 宋晓霞. 吸湿排汗针织面料设计及热湿舒适性评价[J]. 服装学报, 2022, 7(3):196-201,208.
LI Hui, SONG Xiaoxia. Design of moisture-wicking fabric and thermal and moisture comfort evaluation[J]. Journal of Apparel Research, 2022, 7(3):196-201,208.
[1] YAO Chenxi, WAN Ailan. Thermal and moisture comfort of polybutylene terephthalate/polyethylene terephthalate weft-knitted sports T-shirt fabrics [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2024, 45(01): 90-98.
[2] WANG Yutao, CONG Honglian, GU Hongyang. Structural design and thermal-moist comfort of weft knitted knee pads [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2023, 44(10): 68-74.
[3] WANG Hongjie, HU Zhongwen, WANG He, FENG Quan, LIN Tong. Research progress in one-way water transport textiles and their applications [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2022, 43(11): 195-202.
[4] QIAN Juan, XIE Ting, ZHANG Peihua, FU Shaoju. Thermal and moisture comfort performance of polyethylene knitted fabric [J]. Journal of Textile Research, 2022, 43(07): 60-66.
[5] . Evaluation of feeding performance based on error analysis of motion trajectory [J]. JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH, 2012, 33(9): 143-147.
[6] XU Ruichao;CHEN Li′na;YANG Wen. Oriented moisture transfer of knitted fabrics [J]. JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH, 2008, 29(3): 21-24.
[7] KONG Lingjian;YAN Xiong. Application of gray system theory in evaluation of thermal and moisture comfort of bast fiber fabrics [J]. JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH, 2007, 28(4): 41-44.
[8] LI Xiao-feng. Grey system analysis on raw ramie and the quality of its yarn [J]. JOURNAL OF TEXTILE RESEARCH, 2006, 27(1): 20-22.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!